Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/91407
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Study of spinal cord substructure expansion margin in esophageal cancer
Authors: Li, D
Wei, S
Li, T 
Liu, Y
Cai, J 
Ge, H
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2021
Source: Technology in cancer research and treatment, 1 Jan. 2021, v. 20, p. 1-6
Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the setup errors and residual errors of different spinal cord parts in esophageal cancer patients and to explore the necessity of spinal cord segmental expansion.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty cases of esophageal cancer were included with 20 patients subdivided into the following groups: neck, chest and abdomen as per the treatment site. The patients underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between 2017 and 2019. Thermoplastic mask or vacuum bag were utilized for immobilization of different groups. CTVision (Siemens CT-On-Rail system) was used to acquire pre-treatment CT, and 20 consecutive pre-treatment CT datasets were collected for data analysis for each case. Images were exported to MIM (MIM Software Inc.) for processing and data analysis. Dice coefficient, maximum Hausdorff distance and centroid coordinate values between the spinal cord contours in the pre-treatment CTs and the planning CT were calculated and extracted. The contour expansion margin value is calculated as MPRV = 1.3 ∑ total + 0.5 σ total, where ∑ total and σ total are the systematic and random error, respectively.
RESULTS: For neck, chest, abdominal segments of the spinal cord, the mean Dice coefficients (± SD) are 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.80 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.06, the maximum Hausdorff distance residual error (± SD) are 4.46 ± 0.55, 3.49 ± 0.53, 3.46 ± 0.69 mm, and the mean centroid coordinate residual error (± SD) are 2.40 ± 0.53, 1.66 ± 0.47, 2.14 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. The calculated margin using residual centroid method in medial-lateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranial-caudal (CC) direction of spinal cord in neck, chest, abdominal segments are 3.86, 5.37, 6.36 mm, 3.45, 3.83, 4.51 mm, 4.05, 4.83, 7.06 mm, respectively, and the calculated margin using residual Hausdorff method are 3.10, 5.33 and 6.15 mm, 3.30, 3.77, 4.61 mm, 3.35, 4.76, 6.87 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The setup errors and residual errors are different in each segment of the spinal cord. Different margins expansion should be applied to different segment of spinal cord.
Keywords: Contour expansion
Esophageal cancer radiotherapy
Spinal cord
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Journal: Technology in cancer research and treatment 
ISSN: 1533-0346
DOI: 10.1177/15330338211024559
Rights: © The Author(s) 2021
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
The following publication Li, D., Wei, S., Li, T., Liu, Y., Cai, J., & Ge, H. (2021). Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, 20, 15330338211024559 is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338211024559
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
15330338211024559.pdf208.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

10
Citations as of May 15, 2022

Downloads

1
Citations as of May 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.