Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/96604
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Computingen_US
dc.creatorLiang, Jen_US
dc.creatorBan, Xen_US
dc.creatorYu, Ken_US
dc.creatorQu, Ben_US
dc.creatorQiao, Ken_US
dc.creatorYue, Cen_US
dc.creatorChen, Ken_US
dc.creatorTan, KCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T02:55:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-07T02:55:35Z-
dc.identifier.issn1089-778Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/96604-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication J. Liang et al., "A Survey on Evolutionary Constrained Multiobjective Optimization," in IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 201-221, April 2023 is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2022.3155533.en_US
dc.subjectConstrained multi-objective optimizationen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectConstraint handlingen_US
dc.subjectBenchmark test problemsen_US
dc.titleA survey on evolutionary constrained multi-objective optimizationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage201en_US
dc.identifier.epage221en_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TEVC.2022.3155533en_US
dcterms.abstractHandling constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs) is extremely challenging, since multiple conflicting objectives subject to various constraints require to be simultaneously optimized. To deal with CMOPs, numerous constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs) have been proposed in recent years, and they have achieved promising performance. However, there has been few literature on the systematic review of the related studies currently. This article provides a comprehensive survey for evolutionary constrained multi-objective optimization. We first review a large number of CMOEAs through categorization, and analyze their advantages and drawbacks in each category. Then, we summarize the benchmark test problems and investigate the performance of different constraint handling techniques and different algorithms, followed by some emerging and representative applications of CMOEAs. Finally, we discuss some new challenges and point out some directions of the future research in the field of evolutionary constrained multi-objective optimization.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, Apr. 2023, v. 27, no. 3, p. 201-221en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIEEE transactions on evolutionary computationen_US
dcterms.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125729429-
dc.identifier.eissn1941-0026en_US
dc.description.validate202212 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liang_Survey_Evolutionary_Constrained.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

100
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

59
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

83
Citations as of May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

80
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.