Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/96539
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics-
dc.creatorLi, Aen_US
dc.creatorZhao, Pen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Xen_US
dc.creatorMansourian, Aen_US
dc.creatorAxhausen, KWen_US
dc.creatorQu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T02:55:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-07T02:55:21Z-
dc.identifier.issn1361-9209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/96539-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Li, A., Zhao, P., Liu, X., Mansourian, A., Axhausen, K. W., & Qu, X. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, 103229 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.en_US
dc.subjectComprehensive comparisonen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectE-scooter sharing mobilityen_US
dc.subjectTemporal and statistical distributionen_US
dc.subjectUtilization efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectWasted electricityen_US
dc.titleComprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility : evidence from 30 European citiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume105en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229en_US
dcterms.abstractAlthough e-scooter sharing has become increasingly attractive, little attention has been paid to a comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility in multiple cities. To fill this gap, we conduct a comparative study to reveal the similarity and difference of e-scooter sharing mobility by collecting and analyzing vehicle availability data from 30 European cities during post COVID-19 pandemic. The comparisons are implemented from four perspectives, including temporal trip patterns, statistical characteristics (i.e., trip distance and duration), utilization efficiency, and wasted electricity during idle time. Results suggest that the similarity and difference co-exist between e-scooter sharing services in the cities, and utilization efficiency is significantly related with the number of e-scooters per person and per unit area. Surprisingly, on average nearly 33% of electricity are wasted during idle time in these cities. These research findings can be beneficial to further optimizing e-scooter sharing mobility services for transportation planners and micro-mobility operators.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part D, Transport and environment, Apr. 2022, v. 105, 103229en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part D, Transport and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2022-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126663509-
dc.identifier.artn103229en_US
dc.description.validate202212 bckw-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOS-
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1361920922000591-main.pdf5.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

70
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

77
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

33
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.