Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94219
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorGeng, Den_US
dc.creatorLai, KHen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Qen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T01:08:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-11T01:08:42Z-
dc.identifier.issn0925-5273en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94219-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Geng, D., Lai, K.-h., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Eco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107869 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107869.en_US
dc.subjectContingency theoryen_US
dc.subjectEco-innovationen_US
dc.subjectManufacturingen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectSmall and medium-sized manufacturing enterpriseen_US
dc.titleEco-innovation and its role for performance improvement among Chinese small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprisesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume231en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107869en_US
dcterms.abstractDue to the growing public quest for environmental protection, small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises (SMMEs) are under pressure to adopt eco-innovation to improve their operations. However, whether and how eco-innovation efforts can bring performance improvements may rely on the implementation level of eco-innovation and other traditional environmental management (TEM) practices. Drawing on the contingency theory, we develop and empirically test a model which proposes the existence of different firm clusters of SMMEs based on their eco-innovation implementation levels and that the performance improvement associated with eco-innovation practices is contingent on the firm clusters and TEM practices (i.e., internal source reduction, external compliance and communication, and internal management and control). Using survey data collected from 382 SMMEs in China, our cluster analytic results reveal two firm clusters of SMMEs characterized by three types of eco-innovation (technology, management, and marketing) implementation. From the results, we observed eco-innovation adopters involving 225 SMMEs (58.9% of the sample). The rest of 157 SMMEs (41.1% of the sample) are labeled as eco-innovation planners. T-test results show that the implementation levels of eco-innovation and TEM practices, as well as environmental and economic performance improvements, are different between eco-innovation planners and adopters. Results from hierarchical regression analyses further show that implementing certain eco-innovation practices jointly with TEM practices is beneficial for performance improvements. External compliance and communication are helpful for management innovation to bring environmental performance among eco-innovation planners, but it can be detrimental to environmental image together with marketing innovation. For eco-innovation adopters, internal source reduction is helpful for both technology and management innovation to deliver environmental performance. Technology innovation and internal source reduction can jointly bring economic performance improvement among eco-innovation planners, but such joint efforts can weaken the economic performance improvement for eco-innovation adopters. Our paper contributes knowledge on the role of eco-innovation to bring performance gains among SMMEs in China, a major manufacturing hub in Asia servicing global production demands. We also examine the performance contingencies of eco-innovation with TEM practices in the SMMEs, providing practical implications for them to improve operations, as well as policy insights for governments to promote the performance benefits of eco-innovation, particularly targeting for the smaller-sized manufacturers in the industry.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of production economics, Jan. 2021, v. 231, 107869en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of production economicsen_US
dcterms.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088741380-
dc.identifier.artn107869en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0055-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of China; Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leaderen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS29140208-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lai_EcoInnovation_And_Its.pdfPre-Published version999.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

50
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

19
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

75
Citations as of May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

61
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.