Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94099
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorWu, Zen_US
dc.creatorChen, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T01:07:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-11T01:07:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn2542-5277en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94099-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Co.en_US
dc.rights© John Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wu, Z., & Chen, Z. (2021). A systematic review of experimental research in audiovisual translation 1992–2020. Translation, Cognition & Behavior, 4(2), 281-304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00056.wu is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00056.wu.en_US
dc.rightsTranslation, Cognition & Behavior is available at https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/25425285en_US
dc.subjectAudiovisual translationen_US
dc.subjectExperimenten_US
dc.subjectResearch synthesisen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleA systematic review of experimental research in audiovisual translation 1992–2020en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage281en_US
dc.identifier.epage304en_US
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/tcb.00056.wuen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study systematically reviewed 61 experimental studies on audiovisual translation (AVT), published in academic journals between 1992 and 2020. The review examined five aspects of these studies: publication trends, research scopes, research designs, statistical procedures, and reporting practices. Major findings include: (a) there has been a slight concentration of publication outlets for experimental AVT research; (b) the focal studies could be categorized into three themes (product, process, and pedagogy), with the product theme being the most popular and subtitling the dominant AVT modality; (c) the inclusion of a comparison group was the most common design feature, and questionnaires and tests were the most popular research instruments; (d) inferential statistical analysis was favored over descriptive statistical analysis; (e) data normality information and effect sizes were not regularly reported. Based on the systematic review, suggestions are made for the future development of experimental AVT research.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTranslation, cognition & behavior, 2021, v. 4, no. 2, p. 281-304en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTranslation, cognition & behavioren_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127361020-
dc.identifier.eissn2542-5285en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1576-
dc.identifier.SubFormID45497-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wu_Systematic_Review_Audiovisual.pdfPre-Published version629.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

86
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

150
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.