Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/94095
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLiu, JZen_US
dc.creatorFang, Hen_US
dc.creatorChan, TMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T01:07:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-11T01:07:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn0143-974Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/94095-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCold-forming effecten_US
dc.subjectDesign methodsen_US
dc.subjectHigh strength steelen_US
dc.subjectIrregular hexagonal sectionsen_US
dc.subjectLocal buckling behaviouren_US
dc.titleExperimental investigations on material properties and stub column behaviour of high strength steel irregular hexagonal hollow sectionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume196en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107343en_US
dcterms.abstractComprehensive experimental investigations into the material properties and stub column behaviour of cold-formed high strength steel (HSS) irregular hexagonal hollow sections (IHexHS) are presented in this paper. Apart from the tensile coupons taken from the parent plates, tensile coupons extracted from the flat and corner portions from the cross-sections were also tested in order to measure the effect of the fabrication process on material properties. The strength enhancement predictive models proposed by previous studies were compared with the obtained test results from corner coupons with increased strength due to the cold-forming effect. A total of 20 HSS IHexHS stub column specimens were tested under axial compression and the cross-section classification from the existing structural steel design codes of EN 1993-1-12, ANSI/AISC 360–16, AS 4100, AISI S100–16 and design approaches of DSM and CSM were compared and assessed against the obtained results. It was found that the design provisions of cross-section classification in current design codes cannot be extended to the HSS IHexHS stub columns. Based on current codified yield slenderness limits, the strength predictions from design codes exhibit conservatism without the consideration of strain hardening and beneficial effect of element interaction whereas cross-sections with intermediate slenderness values were over-predicted.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of constructional steel research, Sept 2022, v. 196, 107343en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of constructional steel researchen_US
dcterms.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85133697508-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5983en_US
dc.identifier.artn107343en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1573-
dc.identifier.SubFormID45490-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2024-09-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2024-09-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

52
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Sep 8, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
Citations as of Sep 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Citations as of Sep 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.