Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93792
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorFriedman, RAen_US
dc.creatorPinkley, RLen_US
dc.creatorBottom, WPen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Wen_US
dc.creatorGelfand, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-27T02:34:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-27T02:34:51Z-
dc.identifier.issn1750-4708en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93792-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Association for Conflict Managementen_US
dc.rightsThis article is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial International 4.0 (CC BY NC 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Friedman, R. & Pinkley, R. & Bottom, W. & Liu, W. & Gelfand, M., (2019) “Implicit Theories of Negotiation: Developing a Measure of Agreement Fluidity”, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 13(2), p.127-150 is available at https://doi.org/10.34891/v9td-vd63.en_US
dc.subjectAgreementsen_US
dc.subjectContracten_US
dc.subjectEntity theoryen_US
dc.subjectMindseten_US
dc.subjectNegotiationen_US
dc.subjectPersonalityen_US
dc.titleImplicit theories of negotiation : developing a measure of agreement fluidityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage127en_US
dc.identifier.epage150en_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.34891/v9td-vd63en_US
dcterms.abstractNegotiation scholars generally model agreement as the terminal “endpoint” of the process. From this perspective, parties instantaneously realize their outcomes when agreement is reached. Although this conception may also reflect the understanding of some negotiators (those with what we call a “fixed agreement” mindset), we argue that others actually envision agreement as one step in an ongoing process (what we call a “fluid agreement” mindset). To spur research on this topic, we report initial progress on development of a new measure of agreement fluidity. Basic psychometric properties for this measure were established using six correlational samples that demonstrate aspects of both discriminant and convergent validity. Fixed agreement mindset appears to predict important behaviors during and after the negotiation process.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNegotiation and conflict management research, 1 Apr. 2020, v. 13, no. 2, p. 127-150en_US
dcterms.isPartOfNegotiation and conflict management researchen_US
dcterms.issued2020-04-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070703870-
dc.identifier.eissn1750-4716en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberMM-0086-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS22378428-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ncmr-357-friedman.pdf236.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

45
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

18
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.