Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93724
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.creatorLiang, Jen_US
dc.creatorLaw, MYMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-26T06:12:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-26T06:12:31Z-
dc.identifier.issn2191-1231en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93724-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbHen_US
dc.rights© 2016 by De Gruyteren_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Shek, Daniel T.L., Liang, Jianqiang and Law, Moon Y.M.. "Subjective outcome evaluation of a university subject on leadership and intrapersonal development" International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 15, no. 2, 2016, pp. 231-239 is available at https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0714.en_US
dc.subjectFactor analysisen_US
dc.subjectHolistic developmenten_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.subjectMultiple regressionen_US
dc.subjectSubjective outcome evaluationen_US
dc.subjectUniversity studentsen_US
dc.titleSubjective outcome evaluation of a university subject on leadership and intrapersonal developmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage231en_US
dc.identifier.epage239en_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0714en_US
dcterms.abstractFirst-year undergraduate students (n=890) responded to a 48-item subjective outcome evaluation scale (SOES) after taking a leadership subject at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University in the second semester of the 2012–2013 academic year. Consistent with our expectation, factor analyses showed that the scale contains three dimensions (program, instructor and benefits). Results showed that students had positive perceptions of the program contents and the instructors, and most of the students perceived the subject to be beneficial to their development in different areas. As predicted, perceived qualities of the program and instructors were significant predictors of the perceived effectiveness of the program. Perceived qualities of the program, instructors and benefits predicted student’s overall satisfaction with the program.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal on disability and human development, 2016, v. 15, no. 2, p. 231-239en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal on disability and human developmenten_US
dcterms.issued2016-
dc.identifier.eissn2191-0367en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAPSS-0544-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6650601-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
APSS-0544_Shek_Subjective_Outcome_Evaluation.pdf99.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

24
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

9
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.