Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93721
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.creatorLeung, JTYen_US
dc.creatorMa, CMSen_US
dc.creatorWu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-26T06:12:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-26T06:12:30Z-
dc.identifier.issn2191-1231en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93721-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbHen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Bostonen_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Shek, Daniel T.L., Leung, Janet T.Y., Ma, Cecilia M.S. and Wu, Jing. "Subjective outcome evaluation of the community-based P.A.T.H.S Project: views of program implementers" International Journal on Disability and Human Development, vol. 16, no. 4, 2017, pp. 395-405 is available at https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2017-7008.en_US
dc.subjectAt-risk adolescentsen_US
dc.subjectChinese adolescentsen_US
dc.subjectPositive youth developmenten_US
dc.subjectProject P.A.T.H.S.en_US
dc.subjectSubjective outcome evaluationen_US
dc.titleSubjective outcome evaluation of the community-based P.A.T.H.S Project : views of program implementersen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage395en_US
dc.identifier.epage405en_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ijdhd-2017-7008en_US
dcterms.abstractThe present study adopted subjective outcome evaluation to examine program effectiveness from the views of implementers (N=375) who implemented the community-based Tier 2 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. The results revealed that most of the program implementers were satisfied with the program content, their own performance, and program benefits. In agreement with previous studies, the satisfaction ratings of both program content and implementer performance positively predicted perceived program benefits. Regarding the influences of different program delivery approaches, programs with the “interest-enhancement” (INT) element received a more positive evaluation from implementers than did the programs without that element. For programs with the “work-related” (WORK) element, parental involvement significantly raised implementers’ satisfaction ratings on their own performance. The current findings provided evidence for the effectiveness of the P.A.T.H.S. Tier 2 Program from the perspective of the implementers.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal on disability and human development, Nov. 2017, v. 16, no. 4, p. 395-405en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal on disability and human developmenten_US
dcterms.issued2017-11-
dc.identifier.eissn2191-0367en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAPSS-0484-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trusten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6802852-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
APSS-0484_Shek_Subjective_Outcome_Evaluation.pdf182.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

30
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

7
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.