Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93656
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering-
dc.contributorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering-
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Smart Ageing-
dc.creatorVictorova, Men_US
dc.creatorLee, MKSen_US
dc.creatorNavarro-Alarcon, Den_US
dc.creatorZheng, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T09:03:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-19T09:03:11Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93656-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Victorova, M., Lee, M. K. S., Navarro-Alarcon, D., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Follow the Curve: Robotic Ultrasound Navigation With Learning-Based Localization of Spinous Processes for Scoliosis Assessment. IEEE Access, 10, 40216-40229 is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3165936en_US
dc.subjectComputer vision for medical roboticsen_US
dc.subjectMedical robots and systemsen_US
dc.subjectRobotic manipulationen_US
dc.subjectScoliosisen_US
dc.subjectSpinous processen_US
dc.subjectUltrasound navigationen_US
dc.titleFollow the curve : robotic ultrasound navigation with learning-based localization of spinous processes for scoliosis assessmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage40216en_US
dc.identifier.epage40229en_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3165936en_US
dcterms.abstractThe scoliosis progression in adolescents requires close monitoring to timely take treatment measures. Ultrasound imaging is a radiation-free alternative in scoliosis assessment to X-ray, which is typically used in clinical practice. However, ultrasound images are prone to speckle noise, making it challenging for sonographers to detect bony features and follow the spinal curvature. This study introduces a novel robotic ultrasound approach for spinous process localization and automatic spinal curvature tracking for scoliosis assessment. The positions of the spinous processes are computed using a fully connected network with a deconvolutional head. A 5-fold cross-validation was performed on a dataset of ultrasound images from 25 human subjects with scoliosis. The resulting percentage of correct keypoints of the spinous process is 0.966 ± 0.027 with a mean distance error of 1.0 ± 0.99mm. We use this machine learning-based method to guide the motion of the robot-held ultrasound probe and to follow the spinal curvature while capturing ultrasound images. We present a new force-driven controller that automatically adjusts the pose and orientation of the probe relative to the skin surface, which ensures a good acoustic coupling between the probe and skin. We extended the network architecture to additionally perform classification of the spine into its regions, i.e., sacrum, lumbar, and thoracic, which are used to adjust the probe’s orientation to account for the varying curvature along the spine. After the autonomous scanning, the acquired data is used to reconstruct the coronal spinal image, where the deformity of the scoliosis spine can be assessed and measured. The proposed learning-based method for anatomical landmarks localization was compared to conventional methods based on phase symmetry and image intensity. The learning-based method proved to be more precise for spinous process localization while processing images at a faster rate, which is advantageous for real-time scoliosis scanning. To evaluate the performance of our robotic method, we conducted an experimental study with human scoliosis subjects where deviations of the spinous process from the image center can be compared to those appearing in a manual scan. Our results show that the robotic approach reduces the mean error of spinal curvature following for mild scoliosis from 4.6 ± 4.6mm (manual scanning) to 1.0 ± 0.8mm (robotic scanning); For moderate scoliosis from 4.3 ± 3.9mm (manual scanning) to 2.8 ± 1.8mm (robotic scanning). The angles of spinal deformity measured on spinal reconstruction images were similar for both methods, implying that they equally reflect human anatomy. The spinal region-specific moment-based probe orientation control showed to improve the scanning performance. An ablation study was performed to investigate the importance of each component of the proposed system.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIEEE access, 2022, v. 10, p. 40216-40229en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIEEE accessen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128251380-
dc.identifier.eissn2169-3536en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1544-n01-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextOthers: The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Victorova_Follow_Curve_Robotic.pdf2.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

61
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

32
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.