Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93649
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Nen_US
dc.creatorLo, CWHen_US
dc.creatorZhan, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T08:14:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-19T08:14:01Z-
dc.identifier.issn1530-9576en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93649-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLCen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Public Performance & Management Review on 10 Oct 2018 (Published online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1486214.en_US
dc.subjectCorporate coping strategyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental regulationen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory tiesen_US
dc.titleRegulatory ties and corporate compliance strategiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage580en_US
dc.identifier.epage605en_US
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15309576.2018.1486214en_US
dcterms.abstractBy integrating the environmental regulation literature and managerial ties theory, this research explores how regulatory ties and firm visibility shape formalism and self-determination, two distinct corporate coping strategies for complying with environmental regulatory demands. Based on survey data collected in China, our empirical results show a U-shaped relationship between firms’ regulatory ties and their strict adherence to formal rules (formalism), and an inverted U-shaped relationship between regulatory ties and firm discrepancy in complying with regulations (self-determination). Further, the inverted U-shaped relationship is stronger among firms with less organizational and environmental visibility. Additional analysis further indicates that these relationships are particularly evident in privately owned enterprises. Our study may contribute to the public performance literature by furthering our understanding of regulatory ties as a double-edged sword in corporate compliance.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPublic performance and management review, 2019, v. 42, no. 3, p. 580-605en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPublic performance and management reviewen_US
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054800644-
dc.identifier.eissn1557-9271en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberMM-0148-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextCity University of Hong Kongen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS26583925-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhan_Regulatory_Ties_Corporate.pdfPre-Published version1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

53
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

71
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.