Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93619
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorSwaab, RIen_US
dc.creatorLount, RBen_US
dc.creatorChung, Sen_US
dc.creatorBrett, JMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T08:13:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-19T08:13:50Z-
dc.identifier.issn0749-5978en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93619-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectGoalsen_US
dc.subjectNegotiationen_US
dc.subjectTeamsen_US
dc.subjectTrusten_US
dc.titleSetting the stage for negotiations : how superordinate goal dialogues promote trust and joint gain in negotiations between teamsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage157en_US
dc.identifier.epage169en_US
dc.identifier.volume167en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.08.001en_US
dcterms.abstractAlthough negotiations between teams can result in informational advantages resulting in higher joint gain, the presence of teams can also undermine trust, fuel competition, and impair joint gain. This research addresses this challenge by using structured dialogues to develop trust that helps to establish cooperative interdependence between teams. Building upon prior research in negotiations and intergroup relations, we propose that superordinate goal dialogues can increase trust and facilitate strategy to generate high quality outcomes. Across four face-to-face negotiation studies, we document that structured dialogues about superordinate goals increase trust and teams’ use of negotiation strategy to ultimately improve joint gain. We identify the boundary conditions that shape when superordinate goal dialogues are most likely to increase joint gain, as well as when they will not be effective.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOrganizational behavior and human decision processes, Nov. 2021, v. 167, p. 157-169en_US
dcterms.isPartOfOrganizational behavior and human decision processesen_US
dcterms.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114142403-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9920en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberMM-0002-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2024-11-30en_US
dc.identifier.OPUS55901485-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2024-11-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

47
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.