Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93469
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities : the main routes of exposure
Authors: Morawska, L
Ayoko, GA
Bae, GN
Buonanno, G
Chao, CYH 
Clifford, S
Fu, SC
Hänninen, O
He, C
Isaxon, C
Mazaheri, M
Salthammer, T
Waring, MS
Wierzbicka, A
Issue Date: Nov-2017
Source: Environment international, Nov. 2017, v. 108, p. 75-83
Abstract: It has been shown that the exposure to airborne particulate matter is one of the most significant environmental risks people face. Since indoor environment is where people spend the majority of time, in order to protect against this risk, the origin of the particles needs to be understood: do they come from indoor, outdoor sources or both? Further, this question needs to be answered separately for each of the PM mass/number size fractions, as they originate from different sources. Numerous studies have been conducted for specific indoor environments or under specific setting. Here our aim was to go beyond the specifics of individual studies, and to explore, based on pooled data from the literature, whether there are generalizable trends in routes of exposure at homes, schools and day cares, offices and aged care facilities. To do this, we quantified the overall 24 h and occupancy weighted means of PM10, PM2.5 and PN - particle number concentration. Based on this, we developed a summary of the indoor versus outdoor origin of indoor particles and compared the means to the WHO guidelines (for PM10 and PM2.5) and to the typical levels reported for urban environments (PN). We showed that the main origins of particle metrics differ from one type of indoor environment to another. For homes, outdoor air is the main origin of PM10 and PM2.5 but PN originate from indoor sources; for schools and day cares, outdoor air is the source of PN while PM10 and PM2.5 have indoor sources; and for offices, outdoor air is the source of all three particle size fractions. While each individual building is different, leading to differences in exposure and ideally necessitating its own assessment (which is very rarely done), our findings point to the existence of generalizable trends for the main types of indoor environments where people spend time, and therefore to the type of prevention measures which need to be considered in general for these environments.
Keywords: Aged care indoor particles
Child care indoor particles
Home indoor particles
Indoor aerosols
Indoor particulate matter
Indoor ultrafine particles
Office indoor particles
School indoor particles
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Journal: Environment international 
ISSN: 0160-4120
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.025
Rights: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
The following publication Morawska, L., Ayoko, G. A., Bae, G. N., Buonanno, G., Chao, C. Y. H., Clifford, S., ... & Wierzbicka, A. (2017). Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure. Environment international, 108, 75-83 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.025.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0160412017306840-main.pdf1.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

43
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

33
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

252
Citations as of Apr 5, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

225
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.