Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93369
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.creatorJia, Wen_US
dc.creatorRedigolo, Gen_US
dc.creatorShu, Sen_US
dc.creatorZhao, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T08:22:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-21T08:22:10Z-
dc.identifier.issn0165-4101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93369-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Jia, W., Redigolo, G., Shu, S., & Zhao, J. (2020). Can social media distort price discovery? Evidence from merger rumors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(1), 101334 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101334en_US
dc.subjectMerger and acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectMerger rumoren_US
dc.subjectPersuasion biasen_US
dc.subjectRumoren_US
dc.subjectSocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectTwitteren_US
dc.titleCan social media distort price discovery? Evidence from merger rumorsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author’s file: Can social media distort price discovery? Evidence from merger rumorsen_US
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101334en_US
dcterms.abstractWe study whether social media can play a negative information role by impeding price discovery in the presence of highly speculative rumors. We focus on merger rumors, where most do not materialize. We find that merger rumors accompanied by greater Twitter activity elicit greater immediate market reaction even though rumor-related Twitter activity is unrelated to the probability of merger realization. The price distortion associated with tweet volume persists weeks after a rumor and reverses only after eight weeks. The price distortion is more pronounced for rumors tweeted by Twitter users with greater social influence, for target firms with low institutional ownership, and for rumors that supply more details. Our evidence suggests that social media can be a rumor mill that hinders the market's price discovery of potentially false information.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of accounting and economics, Aug. 2020, v. 70, no. 1, 101334en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of accounting and economicsen_US
dcterms.issued2020-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089006581-
dc.identifier.artn101334en_US
dc.description.validate202206 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAF-0048-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS25513088-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhao_Crowd_Wisdom_Rumor.pdfPre-Published version1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

45
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

97
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
Citations as of May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.