Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93355
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.creatorXu, Xen_US
dc.creatorVoon, JPen_US
dc.creatorShang, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T08:22:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-21T08:22:06Z-
dc.identifier.issn1354-7860en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93355-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy on 18 Aug 2020 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13547860.2020.1807673en_US
dc.subjectContracten_US
dc.subjectExporten_US
dc.subjectHeterogenousen_US
dc.subjectHomogenousen_US
dc.subjectInstitutionen_US
dc.subjectProduct differentiationen_US
dc.titleContract institution and differentiated exportsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage101en_US
dc.identifier.epage123en_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13547860.2020.1807673en_US
dcterms.abstractInstitution is an important determinant of economic growth and development. Contract institution represents a major institution governing economic transactions between private agents. This paper examines how quality of contract institution in source and destination countries influences exports of homogeneous and heterogeneous goods. Using a large sample of cross-country bilateral disaggregate export data, we show that competitive advantages of firms in exports of both homogeneous goods (such as agricultural commodities and minerals) and heterogeneous goods (such as manufactured goods) are eroded by weak contract institution in their source countries. We also find that weak contract institution in the destination countries exerts significant negative impacts on heterogeneous but not homogeneous exports. To explain for the differential source and destination countries’ contract institutional constraints on differentiated exports, we extend the conventional institutional cost theory by taking the differences in relationship specificity of heterogeneous and homogeneous goods into account. Our analysis has policy implications on institutional reform and provides practical location and production strategies for exporting firms.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of the Asia Pacific economy, 2022, v. 27, no. 1, p. 101-123en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of the Asia Pacific economyen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089582038-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-9648en_US
dc.description.validate202206 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAF-0075-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS50565155-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Xu_Contract_Institution_Differentiated.pdfPre-Published version1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

51
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

67
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.