Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93347
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.creatorNiu, Ben_US
dc.creatorChen, Len_US
dc.creatorLiu, Yen_US
dc.creatorJin, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T08:22:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-21T08:22:03Z-
dc.identifier.issn0925-5273en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93347-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Niu, B., Chen, L., Liu, Y., & Jin, Y. (2019). Joint price and quality decisions considering Chinese customers' variety seeking behavior. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 97-107 is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001028.en_US
dc.subjectPricingen_US
dc.subjectQuality improvementen_US
dc.subjectTwo-period modelen_US
dc.subjectVariety seeking behavioren_US
dc.titleJoint price and quality decisions considering Chinese customers' variety seeking behavioren_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage97en_US
dc.identifier.epage107en_US
dc.identifier.volume213en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.022en_US
dcterms.abstractVariety seeking behavior indicates that customers get boredom of the products they purchased before, and prefer new products when they want to purchase again. Considering this, firms have to adjust their price and quality decisions to keep “old” and find “new” customers. In this paper, we build a two-period stylized model by assuming firms’ cost is effort-dependent, which characterizes the tradeoff between managing variety seeking customers and the cost of quality improvement. We show that, customers’ variety seeking behavior leads to a mild competition in period 1 but a fierce competition in period 2, and the existence of variety seeking customers reduces firms’ incentives to improve the quality levels. Regarding price decision, we find that firms charge a low retail price in period 2, but in period 1 the price depends on the effort cost coefficient. Interestingly, we find that firms may be worse off in a mixed market of both regular and variety seeking customers, when the effort cost coefficient is small. That is, firms’ highly efficient quality improvement can be harmful when customers are variety seeking.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of production economics, July 2019, v. 213, p. 97-107en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of production economicsen_US
dcterms.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85063340490-
dc.description.validate202206 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAF-0096-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextCentral Research Grant, PolyU (No. G-YBZV)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS25852115-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jin_Joint_Price_Quality.pdfPre-Published version1.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

57
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

109
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.