Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93252
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorChao, Jen_US
dc.creatorSiu, AMHen_US
dc.creatorLeung, Oen_US
dc.creatorLo, Aen_US
dc.creatorChu, Men_US
dc.creatorLee, WKen_US
dc.creatorAuw, Cen_US
dc.creatorLee, Ven_US
dc.creatorChien, CWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T07:02:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-10T07:02:14Z-
dc.identifier.issn0963-8237en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93252-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Mental Health on 17 Nov 2018 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09638237.2018.1521931en_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricen_US
dc.subjectRaschen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectRecovery self-assessmenten_US
dc.titleChinese version of the recovery self-assessment scale : psychometric evidence from Rasch analysis and reliability estimatesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage206en_US
dc.identifier.epage212en_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638237.2018.1521931en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: The Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA) is a popular and well-validated instrument for assessing recovery-oriented service around the world.en_US
dcterms.abstractAims: This study aims to develop a Chinese version of the RSA, which assesses the recovery orientation of hospital-based mental health services.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: We conducted forward and backward translations of the RSA and modify the translated Chinese based on comments by content experts. We recruited 350 people with mental illnesses who regularly attend hospital and community mental health services. The participants completed the Chinese Recovery Self-Assessment Service User version (CRSA-SU) and convergent measures on hope and mental well-being.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: The Rasch analysis supported five of the six factors in the instrument and suggests that the “Life Goal” factor could be further split into two factors. We identified three misfit items (items 6, 12 and 17) that could be considered for removal. Both the internal consistency and test–retest reliability are between satisfactory and very good within each subscale, with the exception of the Choice subscale. The seven subscales had low positive correlations with measures of hope and mental well-being, which supported the convergent validity of CRSA-SU.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The results supported the factor structure, reliability and validity of the CRSA-SU.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of mental health, 2019, v. 28, no. 2, p. 206-212en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of mental healthen_US
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057301149-
dc.identifier.pmid30449213-
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0567en_US
dc.description.validate202206 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRS-0212-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS11854827-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Siu_Chinese_Version_Recovery.pdfPre-Published version857.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

53
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

45
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.