Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93236
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Rehabilitation Sciences | en_US |
dc.contributor | University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience | en_US |
dc.creator | Derbie, AY | en_US |
dc.creator | Chau, BKH | en_US |
dc.creator | Wong, CHY | en_US |
dc.creator | Chen, LD | en_US |
dc.creator | Ting, KH | en_US |
dc.creator | Lam, BYH | en_US |
dc.creator | Lee, TMC | en_US |
dc.creator | Chan, CCH | en_US |
dc.creator | Smith, Y | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-10T07:02:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-10T07:02:09Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0953-816X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93236 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Derbie, AY, Chau, BKH, Wong, CHY, et al. Common and distinct neural trends of allocentric and egocentric spatial coding: An ALE meta-analysis. Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 53: 3672– 3687, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15240. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be emoved, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited. | en_US |
dc.subject | Allocentric frame of reference | en_US |
dc.subject | Egocentric frame of reference | en_US |
dc.subject | Neuroimaging meta-analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Parieto-frontal circuit | en_US |
dc.subject | Parieto-occipital circuit | en_US |
dc.subject | Spatial judgment | en_US |
dc.subject | Spatial navigation | en_US |
dc.title | Common and distinct neural trends of allocentric and egocentric spatial coding : an ALE meta-analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 3672 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 3687 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 53 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ejn.15240 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | The uniqueness of neural processes between allocentric and egocentric spatial coding has been controversial. The distinctive paradigms used in previous studies for manipulating spatial coding could have attributed for the inconsistent results. This study was aimed to generate converging evidence from previous functional brain imaging experiments for collating neural substrates associated with these two types of spatial coding. An additional aim was to test whether test-taking processes would have influenced the results. We obtained coordinate-based functional neuroimaging data for 447 subjects and performed activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Among the 28 experiments, the results indicate two common clusters of convergence. They were the right precuneus and the right superior frontal gyrus as parts of the parieto-frontal circuit. Between-type differences were in the parieto-occipital circuit, with allocentric showing convergence in the superior occipital gyrus (SOG) cluster compared with egocentric showing convergence in the middle occipital gyrus (MOG) cluster. Task-specific influences were only found in allocentric spatial coding. Spatial judgment-oriented tasks seem to increase the demands on manipulating spatial relationships among the visual objects, while spatial navigation tasks seem to increase the demands on maintaining object representations. Our findings address the theoretical controversies on spatial coding that both the allocentric and egocentric types are common in their processes mediated by the parieto-frontal network, while unique and additional processes in the allocentric type are mediated by the parieto-occipital network. The positive results on possible task-specific confound offer insights into the future design of spatial tasks for eliciting spatial coding processes. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | European journal of neuroscience, June 2021, v. 53, no. 11, p. 3672-3687 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | European journal of neuroscience | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2021-06 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85105355830 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33880818 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1460-9568 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202206 bcch | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | RS-0060 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
dc.description.fundingText | GRF | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 53328233 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Derbie_Common_Distinct_Neural.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
60
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024
Downloads
49
Citations as of May 19, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
Citations as of May 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
Citations as of May 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.