Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93236
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.contributorUniversity Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscienceen_US
dc.creatorDerbie, AYen_US
dc.creatorChau, BKHen_US
dc.creatorWong, CHYen_US
dc.creatorChen, LDen_US
dc.creatorTing, KHen_US
dc.creatorLam, BYHen_US
dc.creatorLee, TMCen_US
dc.creatorChan, CCHen_US
dc.creatorSmith, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T07:02:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-10T07:02:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0953-816Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93236-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltden_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Derbie, AY, Chau, BKH, Wong, CHY, et al. Common and distinct neural trends of allocentric and egocentric spatial coding: An ALE meta-analysis. Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 53: 3672– 3687, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15240. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be emoved, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.en_US
dc.subjectAllocentric frame of referenceen_US
dc.subjectEgocentric frame of referenceen_US
dc.subjectNeuroimaging meta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectParieto-frontal circuiten_US
dc.subjectParieto-occipital circuiten_US
dc.subjectSpatial judgmenten_US
dc.subjectSpatial navigationen_US
dc.titleCommon and distinct neural trends of allocentric and egocentric spatial coding : an ALE meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage3672en_US
dc.identifier.epage3687en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejn.15240en_US
dcterms.abstractThe uniqueness of neural processes between allocentric and egocentric spatial coding has been controversial. The distinctive paradigms used in previous studies for manipulating spatial coding could have attributed for the inconsistent results. This study was aimed to generate converging evidence from previous functional brain imaging experiments for collating neural substrates associated with these two types of spatial coding. An additional aim was to test whether test-taking processes would have influenced the results. We obtained coordinate-based functional neuroimaging data for 447 subjects and performed activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Among the 28 experiments, the results indicate two common clusters of convergence. They were the right precuneus and the right superior frontal gyrus as parts of the parieto-frontal circuit. Between-type differences were in the parieto-occipital circuit, with allocentric showing convergence in the superior occipital gyrus (SOG) cluster compared with egocentric showing convergence in the middle occipital gyrus (MOG) cluster. Task-specific influences were only found in allocentric spatial coding. Spatial judgment-oriented tasks seem to increase the demands on manipulating spatial relationships among the visual objects, while spatial navigation tasks seem to increase the demands on maintaining object representations. Our findings address the theoretical controversies on spatial coding that both the allocentric and egocentric types are common in their processes mediated by the parieto-frontal network, while unique and additional processes in the allocentric type are mediated by the parieto-occipital network. The positive results on possible task-specific confound offer insights into the future design of spatial tasks for eliciting spatial coding processes.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEuropean journal of neuroscience, June 2021, v. 53, no. 11, p. 3672-3687en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEuropean journal of neuroscienceen_US
dcterms.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105355830-
dc.identifier.pmid33880818-
dc.identifier.eissn1460-9568en_US
dc.description.validate202206 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRS-0060-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextGRFen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS53328233-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Derbie_Common_Distinct_Neural.pdfPre-Published version1.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

60
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

49
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.