Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92648
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of English and Communication | en_US |
dc.creator | Schluter, A | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-04T03:21:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-04T03:21:12Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-6303 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92648 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | De Gruyter | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Schluter, Anne. "Hybrid language practices on Turkey’s national Kurdish television station: Iconic perspectives on form " Applied Linguistics Review, vol. 10, no. 3, 2019, pp. 417-442 is available at https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0051. | en_US |
dc.subject | Hybridity | en_US |
dc.subject | Iconization | en_US |
dc.subject | Kurdish | en_US |
dc.subject | Media | en_US |
dc.subject | Metalinguistic comments | en_US |
dc.title | Hybrid language practices on Turkey’s national Kurdish television station : iconic perspectives on form | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 417 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 442 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/applirev-2017-0051 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | The language policy of Turkey’s state-run Kurdish television station (TRT Kurdî) allows for Kurdish-Turkish hybridity, which reflects common practice among Turkish Kurds (Schluter, Anne. 2014. Competing or compatible language identities in Istanbul’s Kurmanji workplaces? In Kristina Kamp, Ayhan Kaya, Fuat Keyman & Özge Onursal-Beşgül (eds.), Contemporary Turkey at a Glance. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Local and Trans-local Dynamics, 125–137. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.) and promotes ownership among minority language speakers (Hinnenkamp, Volker. 2003. Mixed language varieties of migrant adolescents and the discourse of hybridity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24(1–2). 12–41.). Nevertheless, the mixing of Turkish and apparent disregard for Kurdish language rules has led some of the target audience to reject the station (Öpengin, Ergin. 2012. Sociolinguistic situation of Kurdish in Turkey: Sociopolitical factors and language use patterns. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 217. 151–180.). Such attention to form, according to (Lemon, Alaina. 2002. Form and function in Soviet stage Romani: Modeling metapragmatics through performance institutions. Language in Society 31. 29–64.) is usually reserved for minority language activists and dominant language speakers whereas marginalized minority language speakers frequently focus on function. Through semi-structured interviews with twenty politically engaged Kurdish migrants of Istanbul, the current study investigated metalinguistic criticisms about the station to deconstruct perceptions of the suitability of a hybrid Kurdish broadcasting language in relation to findings from (Lemon, Alaina. 2002. Form and function in Soviet stage Romani: Modeling metapragmatics through performance institutions. Language in Society 31. 29–64.) and (Hinnenkamp, Volker. 2003. Mixed language varieties of migrant adolescents and the discourse of hybridity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24(1–2). 12–41.). In contrast to (Hinnenkamp, Volker. 2003. Mixed language varieties of migrant adolescents and the discourse of hybridity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24(1–2). 12–41.), participants viewed linguistic hybridity on TRT Kurdî as iconic (Irvine, Judith & Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: ideologies, politics, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.) of the Turkish state’s agenda to assimilate its Kurdish population. Furthermore, the transfer of this agenda onto a sub-group within the same in-group, TRT Kurdî’s producers, provided evidence of fractal recursivity (Irvine, Judith & Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: ideologies, politics, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.). Results call for a broadening of Lemon (2002) to allow for the inclusion of a larger portion of minority language-speaking populations whose language, similar to the Istanbul-resident Kurdish community profiled in the current study, has been deeply politicized. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Applied linguistics review, 2019, v. 10, no. 3, p. 417-442 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Applied linguistics review | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85037727943 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1868-6311 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202204 bchy | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a1356, ENGL-0092 | - |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 44675 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 6805358 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.1515_applirev-2017-0051.pdf | 2.31 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
36
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024
Downloads
57
Citations as of May 19, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of May 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
Citations as of May 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.