Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92466
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Categorical perception of speech sounds in adults who stutter
Authors: Bakhtiar, M 
Shao, J
Cheung, MN 
Zhang, C 
Issue Date: 2021
Source: Clinical linguistics and phonetics, 2021, v. 35, no. 6, p. 560-576
Abstract: Stuttering is often attributed to the impaired speech production system, however, there is growing evidence implicating issues in speech perception. Our previous research showed that children who stutter have similar patterns but slower categorical perception (i.e. the ability to categorise different acoustic variations of the speech sounds into the same or different phonemic categories) compared to the children who do not stutter. This study aimed to extend our previous research to adults who stutter (AWS) using the same categorical perception paradigm. Fifteen AWS and 15 adults who do not stutter (A WNS) were recruited to complete identification and discrimination tasks involving acoustic variations of Cantonese speech sounds in four stimulus contexts: consonants (varying in voice onset times, VOTs), lexical tones, vowels and pure tones. The results showed similar categorical perception between the two groups in terms of the boundary position and width in the identification task and between-category benefits in the discrimination task. However, there were some trends for lower discrimination accuracy (overall d’ scores) and slower discrimination of the between-category stimuli versus within-category stimuli for AWS than AWNS. These results partially confirm our previous finding on children in terms of a comparable pattern of categorical perception between the two groups, but slower processing speed to access the phoneme representations in speech perception among AWS than AWNS.
Keywords: Categorical perception
Discrimination
Identification
Speech perception
Stuttering
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Journal: Clinical linguistics and phonetics 
ISSN: 0269-9206
EISSN: 1464-5076
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1803407
Rights: © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics on 12 Aug 2020 (Published online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02699206.2020.1803407
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
44232_Manuscript-Accepted_version_PIRA.pdfPre-Published version1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

56
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 5, 2024

Downloads

95
Citations as of May 5, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of May 3, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.