Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92306
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies | en_US |
dc.creator | Pease, A | en_US |
dc.creator | Pease, JC | en_US |
dc.creator | Cheung, AKF | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T08:47:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T08:47:27Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0521-9744 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92306 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Benjamins | en_US |
dc.rights | © John Benjamins Publishing Company | en_US |
dc.rights | This is the accepted version of the publication Pease, A., Pease, J. C., & Cheung, A. K. (2018). Formal ontology for discourse analysis of a corpus of court interpreting. Babel, 64(4), 594-618. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00054.pea | en_US |
dc.subject | Corpus | en_US |
dc.subject | Court interpreting | en_US |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject | Ontology | en_US |
dc.title | Formal ontology for discourse analysis of a corpus of court interpreting | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 594 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 618 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 64 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1075/babel.00054.pea | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | We develop a new method of discourse analysis using speech act theory and formal ontology. The method constitutes an attempt to make discourse analysis more formal and repeatable. We apply the method to a corpus of bilingual, interpreted legal dialogue, focusing on the speech act of clarification and its component acts. While discourse analysis is primarily a qualitative tool, it can be applied quantitatively by counting certain types of discourse, such as clarification speech acts. Dialogues are still analysed, utterances are classified as speech acts and their semantic relationships are qualitatively assessed. Subjectivity of human analysis is minimised using a new method of discourse analysis that employs a formal ontology. The ontology is stated in higher-order logic making the annotation of the corpus more objective, formal and repeatable than prior research. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Babel, Dec. 2018, v. 64, no. 4, p. 594-618 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Babel | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2018-12 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85060719700 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1569-9668 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202203 bcfc | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a1212-n06, CBS-0316 | - |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 44187 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 60023429 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FAM_formal_ontology.pdf | Pre-Published version | 704.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
70
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024
Downloads
94
Citations as of May 12, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
7
Citations as of May 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
Citations as of May 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.