Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92304
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies | en_US |
dc.creator | Song, S | en_US |
dc.creator | Cheung, AKF | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T08:47:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-17T08:47:26Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-7647 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92304 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Benjamins | en_US |
dc.rights | © John Benjamins Publishing Company | en_US |
dc.rights | This is the accepted version of the publication Song, S., & Cheung, A. K. (2019, July). Disfluency in relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting: An initial exploration. In FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction/International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, v. 17, no. 1, p. 1-19. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.18016.che | en_US |
dc.subject | Disfluency | en_US |
dc.subject | Filled pauses | en_US |
dc.subject | Relay interpreting | en_US |
dc.subject | Repairs | en_US |
dc.subject | United Nations | en_US |
dc.title | Disfluency in relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting an initial exploration | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1075/forum.18016.che | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | This corpus-based study explores the effects of relay interpreting at meetings of the United Nations General Assembly by comparing features of disfluency between the outputs of relay and non-relay simultaneous interpreting (SI). The findings are as follows: (1) the output of relay interpreting is shorter and more dispersive than that of non-relay interpreting; (2) filled pauses are the most common type of disfluency; and (3) the relay SI output shows fewer lexical and phonetic E-repairs and more A-repairs for ambiguity, syntactic E-repairs, and D-repairs than the non-relay output. The results suggest that the use of relay vs. non-relay interpreting may affect interpreters' output. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Forum-Revue Internationale d'Interpretation Et De Traduction (International Journal of Interpretation and Translation), July 2019, v. 17, no. 1, p. 1-19 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Forum-Revue Internationale d'Interpretation Et De Traduction (International Journal of Interpretation and Translation) | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2019-07 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85070419409 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2451-909X | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202203 bcfc | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a1212-n04, CBS-0223 | en_US |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 44184 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 28144709 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FAM_disfluency.pdf | Pre-Published version | 852.42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
53
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024
Downloads
128
Citations as of May 12, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
14
Citations as of May 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
9
Citations as of May 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.