Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/92303
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorMa, Xen_US
dc.creatorCheung, AKFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T08:47:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T08:47:26Z-
dc.identifier.issn0521-9744en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/92303-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjaminsen_US
dc.rights© John Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Ma, X., & Cheung, A. K. (2020). Language interference in English-Chinese simultaneous interpreting with and without text. Babel, 66(3), 434-456. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00168.cheen_US
dc.subjectEnglish-Chinese interpretingen_US
dc.subjectLanguage interferenceen_US
dc.subjectLanguage specificityen_US
dc.titleLanguage interference in English-Chinese simultaneous interpreting with and without texten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage434en_US
dc.identifier.epage456en_US
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/babel.00168.cheen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study investigated the effect of source language interference during English-Chinese simultaneous interpreting (SI) with and without text by examining the relationships between manifestations of language interference and interpreting modes. A corpus-based descriptive approach was used to investigate language interference during English-Chinese interpreting at various sessions of the United Nations General Assembly. An intermodal comparison was carried out in three dimensions, addressing (1) the general linguistic properties of the interpreted texts; (2) the distribution of reformulation strategies; and (3) strategies for interpreting passive constructions and attributive clauses, two structures representing structural asymmetries between English and Chinese. The results indicated that the interpreted texts produced by SI with text and SI without text showed different degrees of language interference.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBabel, June 2020, v. 66, no. 3, p. 434-456en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBabelen_US
dcterms.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088301849-
dc.identifier.eissn1569-9668en_US
dc.description.validate202203 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1212-n02, CBS-0117en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID44181-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24759167en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FAM_language_interference.pdfPre-Published version773.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

77
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

304
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.