Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90932
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electrical Engineering-
dc.creatorHuang, J-
dc.creatorFu, W-
dc.creatorNiu, S-
dc.creatorZhao, X-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T02:35:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T02:35:21Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/90932-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Huang, W. Fu, S. Niu and X. Zhao, "Comparative Analysis of Different Permanent Magnet Arrangements in a Novel Flux Modulated Electric Machine," in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 14437-14445, 2021 is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052545en_US
dc.subjectDual PMen_US
dc.subjectElectric machinesen_US
dc.subjectFinite element methodsen_US
dc.subjectPermanent magnet machinesen_US
dc.subjectTorque densityen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of different permanent magnet arrangements in a novel flux modulated electric machineen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage14437-
dc.identifier.epage14445-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052545-
dcterms.abstractA novel dual permanent magnet (PM) machine with Halbach segmentation flux modulation is proposed in this paper, which is evolved from a flux switching PM machine (FSPM). In order to improve the performance of the FSPM, several PM arrangement methods have been adopted and three new different structures have been investigated. To achieve a fair comparison, all the structures are under the same size and rotate at the same speed. The performances of output torque and back EMF are compared. The analysis results show that the dual PM with Halbach segmentation has the highest torque density and power efficiency. The torque is improved by 100.3% from the FSPM while the PM volume does not increase too much. The unique of this best structure is that it not only combines the vernier machine and FSPM machine together, but also reduces the torque ripple. The performance of the motor is verified by the simulation using finite-element analysis (FEA).-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIEEE access, 2021, v.9, 9328242, p. 14437-14445-
dcterms.isPartOfIEEE access-
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099731766-
dc.identifier.eissn2169-3536-
dc.identifier.artn9328242-
dc.description.validate202109 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

54
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

11
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.