Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90825
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies-
dc.creatorYan, K-
dc.creatorHua, G-
dc.creatorCheng, ETC-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T02:34:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-03T02:34:20Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/90825-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yan, K.; Hua, G.; Cheng, T.C.E. Green Supply Chain Management with Cooperative Promotion. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3204 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063204en_US
dc.subjectCooperative promotionen_US
dc.subjectCross-marketen_US
dc.subjectGame theoryen_US
dc.subjectPricingen_US
dc.subjectSupply chain managementen_US
dc.titleGreen supply chain management with cooperative promotionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su13063204-
dcterms.abstractGreen supply chain management has received increasing attention as consumers have become more environmentally conscious. Manufacturers are making green investments to meet consumers’ demands, while retailers in different markets often engage in cooperative promotion to attract more consumers. This study develops game theoretic models for investigating cooperative promotion for two cross-market firms with different channel structures, i.e., decentralized and cen-tralized. The manufacturer determines the wholesale price for the retailers and the green investment of a product, and the retailers determine the promotional effort and retail price. This study finds that whether the firms join in cooperative promotion mainly depends on the wholesale price, as well as the impacts of the price, green investment, and cooperative promotional activities on the demand. When the wholesale price is relatively low, the retail price of the decentralized green supply chain must be lower than that of the centralized green supply chain. On the contrary, the difference in the retail price between the two green supply chains varies with the impacts of green investment and cooperative promotional activities on demand. In addition, due to the influence of channel structure, the contribution to cooperative promotion of the centralized supply chain is more than that of the decentralized supply chain with the most given conditions. Moreover, as the impact of cooperative promotional activities on demand increases, the centralized green supply chain does not necessarily result in higher profits than the decentralized green supply chain.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, Mar. 2021, v. 13, no. 6, 3204-
dcterms.isPartOfSustainability-
dcterms.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103107458-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.artn3204-
dc.description.validate202109 bcvc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sustainability-13-03204-v2.pdf761.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

99
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

21
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.