Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90611
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorAhmad, Jen_US
dc.creatorYu, Ten_US
dc.creatorHadi, MNSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T01:52:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-04T01:52:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0889-3241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/90611-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Concrete Instituteen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021, American Concrete Institute. All rights reserved, including the making of copies unless permission is obtained from the copyright proprietors.en_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.subjectBasalten_US
dc.subjectBasalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (BFRP)en_US
dc.subjectCompressive behavioren_US
dc.subjectConfined geopolymer concreteen_US
dc.subjectGeopolymer concreteen_US
dc.subjectGlass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)en_US
dc.subjectStress-strain modelen_US
dc.titleBasalt fiber-reinforced polymer-confined geopolymer concreteen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage289en_US
dc.identifier.epage300en_US
dc.identifier.volume118en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14359/51728094en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper investigates the behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) confinement on geopolymer concrete (GPC) cylinders under axial monotonic compression. Results were compared with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) confinement on GPC cylinders. Effects of confinement on failure mode, stress-strain behavior, peak axial compressive stress, and ultimate axial strain of the tested specimens were ascertained and discussed. It was observed that the confinement of BFRP is more effective than the GFRP due to the higher elastic modulus and larger rupture strain of the former. Results were also compared with the existing stress-strain models for FRP confined ordinary portland cement concrete (OPC). It was observed that the existing stress-strain models generally cannot provide accurate predictions of the stress-strain behavior of FRP confined GPC. It was concluded that BFRP confined GPC can be considered as a sustainable alternative to the FRP confined OPC.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationACI structural journal, Jan. 2021, v. 118, no. 1, p. 289-300en_US
dcterms.isPartOfACI structural journalen_US
dcterms.issued2021-01-
dc.description.validate202108 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0992-n09-
dc.identifier.SubFormID2356-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0992-n09.pdf2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

86
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

207
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.