Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88834
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering-
dc.creatorLeung, MF-
dc.creatorCoello, CAC-
dc.creatorCheung, CC-
dc.creatorNg, SC-
dc.creatorLui, AKF-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T01:08:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-22T01:08:18Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88834-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication M. -F. Leung, C. A. C. Coello, C. -C. Cheung, S. -C. Ng and A. K. -F. Lui, "A Hybrid Leader Selection Strategy for Many-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 189527-189545, 2020 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031002en_US
dc.subjectParticle swarm optimizationen_US
dc.subjectConvergenceen_US
dc.subjectEuclidean distanceen_US
dc.subjectBenchmark testingen_US
dc.subjectLinear programmingen_US
dc.subjectPareto optimizationen_US
dc.subjectMany-objective optimizationen_US
dc.subjectParticle swarm optimizationen_US
dc.subjectLeader selectionen_US
dc.titleA hybrid leader selection strategy for many-objective particle swarm optimizationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage189527-
dc.identifier.epage189545-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031002-
dcterms.abstractMany existing Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimizers (MOPSOs) may encounter difficulties for a set of good approximated solutions when solving problems with more than three objectives. One possible reason is that the diluted selection pressure causes MOPSOs to fail to generate a set of good approximated Pareto solutions. In this paper, a new approach called the Hybrid Global Leader Selection Strategy (HGLSS) is proposed to deal with many-objective problems more effectively. HGLSS provides two global leader selection mechanisms: one for exploration and one for exploitation. Each particle (solution) can choose one of these two leader selection schemes to identify its global best leader. An external archive is adopted for maintaining the diversity of the found solutions and it contains the final solution reported at the end of the run. The update of the external archive is based on both Pareto dominance and density estimation. The performance of the proposed approach is compared with respect to nine state-of-the-art multi-objective metaheuristics in solving several benchmark problems. Our results indicate that the proposed algorithm generally outperforms the others in terms of Modified Inverted Generational Distance (IGD(+;)) indicator.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIEEE access, 2020, , v. 8, p. 189527-189545-
dcterms.isPartOfIEEE access-
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000583548200001-
dc.identifier.eissn2169-3536-
dc.description.validate202012 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Leung_Hybrid_Leader_Strategy.pdf7.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

32
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

29
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
Citations as of May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.