Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88742
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorKan, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T01:07:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-22T01:07:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn0016-7185en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88742-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Kan, K. (2020). Building SoHo in Shenzhen: The territorial politics of gentrification and state making in China. Geoforum, 111, 1-10 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.020en_US
dc.subjectGentrificationen_US
dc.subjectLand politicsen_US
dc.subjectCultural clustersen_US
dc.subjectUrban villagesen_US
dc.subjectRural-urban interfaceen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.titleBuilding SoHo in Shenzhen : the territorial politics of gentrification and state making in Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage10en_US
dc.identifier.volume111en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.020en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper examines the territorial politics of gentrification at China's rural-urban interface. Drawing on empirical fieldwork in Shenzhen, it is shown that gentrification in China can be seen as a state-making strategy deployed by the government to consolidate territorial control and extend the reach of the state. Unlike conventional accounts of gentrification which assumes the universality of formal, property-based land tenure, this paper highlights how the prevalence of informality and non-privatized property rights in the post-socialist context produces distinct dynamics of gentrification and state-society interactions at the rural fringe of Chinese cities. While gentrification is often seen as a place-making strategy espoused by entrepreneurial states to attract investment and bolster consumption, it also functions as a state-building tactic for recovering and materializing land rights where property rights are uncertain, under-defined and contested. In the process, uneven patterns of direct and indirect displacement can be observed which reflected a more complex reality than the class replacement thesis commonly found in traditional gentrification.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGeoforum, May 2020, , v. 111, p. 1-10en_US
dcterms.isPartOfGeoforumen_US
dcterms.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000525779200001-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9398en_US
dc.description.validate202012 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0556-n01, OA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID189-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPolyU 25604917en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0016718520300233-main.pdf1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

61
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

36
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
Citations as of May 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.