Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88449
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorChan, APCen_US
dc.creatorNwaogu, JMen_US
dc.creatorNaslund, JAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T03:14:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T03:14:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88449-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001771en_US
dc.subjectMental ill healthen_US
dc.subjectRisk factoren_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectConstruction workersen_US
dc.titleMental ill-health risk factors in the construction industry : systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage04020004-1en_US
dc.identifier.epage04020004-13en_US
dc.identifier.volume146en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001771en_US
dcterms.abstractMental ill health is a significant cause of suicide and disability worldwide. It has particularly affected the construction industry. The construction labor sectors in Australia and the United Kingdom have suicide rates 2 and 3.7 times higher, respectively, than their overall national averages, which has attracted the attention of researchers and the industry. However, few studies have examined the state of construction workers’ mental health. This paper systematically reviews the existing body of knowledge on mental health in the construction industry. In total, 16 journal articles met inclusion criteria, and 32 risk factors (RFs) were deduced. The foremost RFs were related to job demand and job control. A conceptual framework and checklist to aid in better understanding these RFs were developed. In assessing mental health, the primary tool used was the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. The findings of this study help to deepen the understanding of professional mental health assessment scales and relevant RFs and protective factors as used in the construction industry. The study concludes that stronger methodologies are needed for studies into RFs and protective factors in the construction industry.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of construction engineering and management, Mar. 2020, v. 146, no. 3, 04020004, p. 04020004-1-04020004-13en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of construction engineering and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85077751344-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-7862en_US
dc.identifier.artn04020004en_US
dc.description.validate202011 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0509-n02en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MH_risk_factors_JCEM_REVISION_accepted_version_(1).pdfPre-Published version1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

169
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 5, 2024

Downloads

202
Citations as of May 5, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

89
Citations as of May 3, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

82
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.