Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/87756
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies-
dc.creatorCheung, K-
dc.creatorYip, TL-
dc.creatorWan, CLJ-
dc.creatorTsang, H-
dc.creatorZhang, LW-
dc.creatorParpala, A-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T06:26:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-19T06:26:44Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/87756-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Cheung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Cheung K, Yip TL, Wan CLJ, Tsang H, Zhang LW, Parpala A (2020) Differences in study workload stress and its associated factors between transfer students and freshmen entrants in an Asian higher education context. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0233022 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233022en_US
dc.titleDifferences in study workload stress and its associated factors between transfer students and freshmen entrants in an Asian higher education contexten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage23-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0233022-
dcterms.abstractUnlike the studies of freshmen entrants, the learning experiences of community college transfer (CCT) students in the receiving university is a topic that has only started to gain attention in recent decades. Little is known about the differences between CCT and freshmen entrants with regard to their study workload stress and its relationship with their perceptions of the teaching and learning environment, approaches to learning, self-efficacy and generic skills. The purpose of our study was to address this gap. This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted from April 2018 to November 2018 in a university in Hong Kong. The HowULearn questionnaire was adapted to local usage and validated for data collection. In total, 841 CCT students and 978 freshmen entrants completed the survey. The respondents were aged between 19 and 52 years (mean = 21.6, SD = 1.92), and 66.0% were women. The HowULearn questionnaire was determined by factor analyses to have eight factors. The reliabilities of the eight factors were found to be acceptable (Cronbach alphas = 0.709-0.918). The CCT students scored significantly higher than the freshmen entrants for perceived study workload stress and surface approaches to learning, but lower on teaching for understanding & encouraging learning, peer support, and self-efficacy beliefs. The surface approach to learning, deep & organized studying, alignment & constructive feedback, and generic skills were found to be predictors of study workload stress in both groups of students, and in the overall student data. This study has shown that CCT students and freshmen entrants differed with regard to their study workload stress and learning experiences. Our findings provide a message, both for educators in higher education and policy makers in the government-there is not a one-size-fits-all approach to different student populations when it comes to enhancing their learning experiences.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPLoS one, 2020, v. 15, no. 5, e0233022, p. 1-23-
dcterms.isPartOfPLoS one-
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000537496000037-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084871988-
dc.identifier.pmid32413088-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.artne0233022-
dc.description.validate202008 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cheung_Workload_Stress_Freshmen.pdf568.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

82
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

27
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.