Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/87635
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Management-
dc.creatorKoseoglu, MA-
dc.creatorYildiz, M-
dc.creatorPutra, ED-
dc.creatorCiftci, T-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T03:59:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-16T03:59:45Z-
dc.identifier.issn2321-6654-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/87635-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPhcog Neten_US
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Köseoglu MAlı, Yıldız M, Putra EDıraksa, Cıftcı T. Co-Authorship Networks in Business Ethics: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Scientometric Research. 2018;7(3):201-209 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.5530/jscires.7.3.32en_US
dc.subjectBusiness ethicsen_US
dc.subjectCo-authorshipen_US
dc.subjectSocial network analysisen_US
dc.subjectSmall worlden_US
dc.subjectBibliometricsen_US
dc.titleCo-authorship networks in business ethics a longitudinal studyen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage201-
dc.identifier.epage209-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.5530/jscires.7.3.32-
dcterms.abstractThe primary objective of this study was to identify the evolution of collaboration among researchers in business ethics (BE) studies by employing a co-authorship analysis via a social network analysis. Four leading journals-Business and Society (BS), Business Ethics: A European Review (BEER), Business Ethics Quarterly (BEG) and the Journal of Business Ethics (JBE)-were chosen to obtain BE articles that had been published between 1960 and 2015. First, a total of 7289 articles were collected. Then, the attributes of co-authorship networks, which included the assessment of co-authorship networks, a comparison of the attributes of the BE co-authorship network with those of other disciplines, a discussion of whether the small world network theory applied to the BE network and a visualization of critical authors, were explored. As one of the first studies in this field, these research findings provide specific theoretical and practical implications with limitations and the potential for expansion in future studies.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of scientometric research, Sept.-Dec. 2018, v. 7, no. 3, p. 201-209-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of scientometric research-
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000454992600008-
dc.identifier.eissn2320-0057-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2018002125-
dc.description.ros2018-2019 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.validate202007 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Others (ROS1819)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Koseoglu_Co-authorship_Networks_Business.pdf359.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

59
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

32
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.