Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/81821
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorHe, Qen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Wen_US
dc.creatorLu, Pen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T13:44:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-11T13:44:00Z-
dc.identifier.issn1270-9638en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/81821-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights©2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication He, Q., Zhang, W., Lu, P., & Liu, J. (2020). Performance comparison of representative model-based fault reconstruction algorithms for aircraft sensor fault detection and diagnosis. Aerospace Science and Technology, 98, 105649 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105649.en_US
dc.subjectInertial measurement uniten_US
dc.subjectFault detection and diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear disturbance observeren_US
dc.subjectSliding mode observeren_US
dc.subjectIterated optimal two-stage extended Kalman filteren_US
dc.subjectAdaptive two-stage extended Kalman filteren_US
dc.titlePerformance comparison of representative model-based fault reconstruction algorithms for aircraft sensor fault detection and diagnosisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume98en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ast.2019.105649en_US
dcterms.abstractThis article proposes a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO) based approach for aircraft inertial measurement unit (IMU) fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) by making use of dynamic and kinematic relations of the aircraft. Furthermore, the detailed aircraft IMU FDD design using four representative fault reconstruction algorithms (NDO, sliding mode observer (SMO), iterated optimal two-stage extended Kalman filter (IOTSEKF) and adaptive two-stage extended Kalman filter (ATSEKF)) is presented. More importantly, this paper presents a thorough FDD performance comparison using these four representative methods. Different FDD performance indexes such as fault detection time, minimum detectable faults and fault estimation errors are compared under various situations such as different fault types and noise standard deviations. The advantages, drawbacks and tuning of each method are investigated, which provide useful insights to aircraft sensor FDD.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAerospace Science and Technology, Mar. 2020, v. 98, 105649en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAerospace science and technologyen_US
dcterms.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078205348-
dc.identifier.eissn1626-3219en_US
dc.identifier.artn105649en_US
dc.description.validate202002 bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAAE-0091-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS26474300-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lu_Performance_Comparison_Representative.pdfPre-Published version5.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

281
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 5, 2024

Downloads

88
Citations as of May 5, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
Citations as of May 9, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
Citations as of May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.