Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/81685
Title: Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke
Authors: Winairuk, T
Pang, MYC 
Saengsirisuwan, V
Horak, FB
Boonsinsukh, R
Keywords: Psychometric
Physical therapist
Postural balance
Minimal clinically important difference
Patient-reported outcome measures
Cerebrovascular disease
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
Source: Journal of rehabilitation medicine, Oct. 2019, v. 51, no. 9, p. 683-691 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of rehabilitation medicine 
Abstract: Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of 3 different short versions of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest: S-BESTest, Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest) in patients with subacute stroke.
Design: A prospective cohort study.
Participants: Patients with subacute stroke.
Methods: Patients were assessed using the full BESTest. Scores of 3 short-form BESTests were later extracted. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (n = 12) were gathered from 5 raters. Concurrent validity was assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Floor/ceiling effect, internal responsiveness and external responsiveness with the BBS (n = 70) were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-rehabilitation.
Results and conclusion: All short-form BESTests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95-0.99) and excellent concurrent validity (r = 0.93-0.96). Unlike the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, the S-BESTest and BESTest had no significant floor/ceiling effects (< 20%). The standardized response mean of all 4 BESTest versions were large, ranging between 1.19 and 1.57, indicating sufficient internal responsiveness. The area under the curve of the S-BESTest and BESTest were significantly higher than the Brief-BESTest and Mini-BESTest, reflecting better accuracy of the S-BESTest and BESTest in identifying patients with subacute stroke who had balance improvement using the minimal clinically important difference of 6 and 16 points, respectively. These findings suggest that the S-BESTest is a short-form BESTest that is appropriate for assessing balance impairments in patients with subacute stroke.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/81685
ISSN: 1650-1977
EISSN: 1651-2081
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2589
Rights: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license. www.medicaljournals.se/jrm
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Journal Compilation © 2019 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information.
The following publication Winairuk, T., Pang, M. Y. C., Saengsirisuwan, V., Horak, F. B., & Boonsinsukh, R. (2019). Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 51(9), 683-691 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2589
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Winairuk_Three_Shortened_Balance.pdf586.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Contents

Page view(s)

16
Citations as of May 6, 2020

Download(s)

11
Citations as of May 6, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.