Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/81648
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorHo, LYW-
dc.creatorChin, KCW-
dc.creatorFung, CYY-
dc.creatorLai, CKY-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T12:28:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-10T12:28:24Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/81648-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2019 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ho, L. Y. W., Chin, K. C. W., Fung, C. Y. Y., & Lai, C. K. Y. (2020). Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability. Nursing Open, 7(1), 390-397 is available at https://dx.doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398en_US
dc.subjectHorticultural therapyen_US
dc.subjectInstrument developmenten_US
dc.subjectInstrument responsivenessen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual disabilityen_US
dc.subjectProcess evaluationen_US
dc.subjectReliability and validityen_US
dc.titleValidation of the Chinese non-pharmacological therapy experience scale in persons with intellectual disabilityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage390en_US
dc.identifier.epage397en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nop2.398en_US
dcterms.abstractAim: To validate the 4- and 7-point Chinese Non-pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability.-
dcterms.abstractDesign: A validation study.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: Sixty-seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six hostels or centres for persons with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. A total of 1,163 and 1,161 observations were collected by the trained observers with the 4-point and 7-point scales, respectively. The floor and ceiling effects, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness of both scales and the scale equivalence were examined.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The Cronbach's alpha of the 4- and 7-point scales was .762 and .797, respectively. The correlation between the two scales was 0.906. The inter-rater reliability of the 4- and 7-point scales was 0.774 and 0.835, respectively. Neither scale had the floor or ceiling effects. The effect size of the 7-point scale was consistently higher than that of the 4-point scale.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNursing open, Jan. 2019, v. 7, no. 1, p. 390-397-
dcterms.isPartOfNursing open-
dcterms.issued2019-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000490113000001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074363664-
dc.identifier.eissn2054-1058en_US
dc.description.validate202002 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ho_Validation_Chinese_Non-pharmacological.pdf411.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

97
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

69
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.