Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80832
Title: Comparison of magnetic auriculotherapy, laser auriculotherapy and their combination for treatment of insomnia in the elderly : a double-blinded randomised trial
Authors: Suen, LKP 
Molassiotis, A 
Yeung, SKW 
Yeh, CH
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Source: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, 2019, v. 2019, 3651268, p. 1-19 How to cite?
Journal: Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 
Abstract: Background. Insomnia is common amongst the elderly. With the adverse effects of prolonged use of hypnotics, the exploration of noninvasive and nonpharmacological complementary methods for insomnia is warranted. Auriculotherapy (AT) is a therapeutic approach where specific points on the auricle are stimulated to manage various physiological disorders. The purpose of this study is to determine the desirable treatment modality using AT to improve the sleep conditions of the elderly. Methods. A three-arm double-blinded randomised trial was conducted on 145 eligible subjects. This study investigated three minimally invasive procedures, namely, laser auriculotherapy (LAT), magneto-auriculotherapy (MAT), and their combination. Seven auricular points were used. Treatment was performed three times a week, for six weeks. Subjects were assessed at baseline, six weeks, and follow-up after six weeks, three months, and six months. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate interactions amongst the groups over time based on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), sleep parameters using actigraphic monitoring, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using SF-12, and PHQ-9 for depression status. Results. The treatment effects of the three procedures were comparable. Significant improvements were found in all of the subjective measures (PSQI, HRQOL, and PHQ-9) for individual groups over time. Improvements in the objective sleep parameters using actigraphic monitoring were detected in subjects who received MAT procedures but not in those who received LAT. The combined MAT and LAT approach did not show any advantage over MAT. Conclusions. The treatment effects of the three procedures were comparable in subjective parameters but not by objective measures using actigraphic monitoring. Longer therapeutic course and more frequent administration of LAT may be considered in future trials to achieve the optimal treatment effect. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02970695, registered May 2016.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80832
ISSN: 1741-427X
EISSN: 1741-4288
DOI: 10.1155/2019/3651268
Rights: Copyright © 2019 Lorna K. P. Suen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the CreativeCommons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The following publication Suen, L. K. P., Molassiotis, A., Yueng, S. K. W., & Yeh, C. H. (2019). Comparison of magnetic auriculotherapy, laser auriculotherapy and their combination for treatment of insomnia in the elderly : a double-blinded randomised trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2019, 1-19 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3651268
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Suen_Comparison_Magnetic_Auriculotherapy.pdf3.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Contents

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.