Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80612
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorChoy, EHE-
dc.creatorCheung, H-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-23T08:16:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-23T08:16:29Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/80612-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Choy, Cheung. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Choy EEH, Cheung H (2018) Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0207912 is available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912en_US
dc.titleTime perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastinationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0207912en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control Inventory, Locomotion and Assessment Scale, and Lay’s General Procrastination scale. Results showed that procrastination was negatively related to locomotion orientation but positively associated with assessment orientation. The relations between regulatory mode and procrastination were mediated by negative affective state, internal sense of control, and negative past and future time perspectives. These findings suggest not only a behavioral link between regulatory mode and procrastination but also affective and cognitive differences in locomotion and assessment orientations that may account for such linkage. The present results also provide empirical support for the theory of locomotion-temporality interface (Kruglanski, Pierro, & Higgins, 2016).-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPLoS one, 2018, v. 13, no. 12, e0207912-
dcterms.isPartOfPLoS one-
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058217041-
dc.identifier.pmid30532229-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.artne0207912en_US
dc.description.validate201904 bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Choy_Time_perspective_control.pdf795.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

90
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

76
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.