Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80501
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorLin, CY-
dc.creatorHwang, JS-
dc.creatorWang, WC-
dc.creatorLai, WW-
dc.creatorSu, WC-
dc.creatorWu, TY-
dc.creatorYao, G-
dc.creatorWang, JD-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-26T09:17:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-26T09:17:33Z-
dc.identifier.issn0929-6646-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/80501-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018, Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lin, C. Y., Hwang, J. S., Wang, W. C., Lai, W. W., Su, W. C., Wu, T. Y., . . . Wang, J. D. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF, Taiwan version, across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors: Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 118(1), 2, 215-222 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.03.018en_US
dc.subjectConfirmatory factor analysisen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectRasch analysisen_US
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF, Taiwan version, across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors : Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage215-
dc.identifier.epage222-
dc.identifier.volume118-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfma.2018.03.018-
dcterms.abstractBackground: Quality of life (QoL) is important for clinicians to evaluate how cancer survivors judge their sense of well-being, and WHOQOL-BREF may be a good tool for clinical use. However, at least three issues remain unresolved: (1) the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF for cancer patients are insufficient; (2) the scoring method used for WHOQOL-BREF needs to be clarify; (3) whether different types of cancer patients interpret the WHOQOL-BREF similarly.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: We recruited 1000 outpatients with head/neck cancer, 1000 with colorectal cancer, 965 with liver cancer, 1438 with lung cancer and 1299 with gynecologic cancers in a medical center. Data analyses included Rasch models, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Pearson correlations.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The mean WHOQOL-BREF domain scores were between 13.34 and 14.77 among all participants. CFA supported construct validity; Rasch models revealed that almost all items were embedded in their expected domains and were interpreted similarly across five types of cancer patients; all correlation coefficients between Rasch scores and original domain scores were above 0.9.-
dcterms.abstractConclusion: The linear relationship between Rasch scores and domain scores suggested that the current calculations for domain scores were applicable and without serious bias. Clinical practitioners may regularly collect and record the WHOQOL-BREF domain scores into electronic health records.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of the Formosan Medical Association, Jan. 2019, v. 118, no. 1, pt. 2, p. 215-222-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of the Formosan Medical Association-
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000455212200002-
dc.identifier.pmid29661488-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-0821-
dc.description.validate201903 bcrc-
dc.description.oapublished_final-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lin_Psychometric_WHOQOL-BREF_Taiwan.pdf581.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
Citations as of Feb 14, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Citations as of Jul 9, 2020

Page view(s)

214
Citations as of Feb 12, 2020

Download(s)

55
Citations as of Feb 12, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.