Back to results list
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Determining the types of contrasts : the influences of prosody on pragmatic inferences||Authors:||Chen, IH
negative polarity items
|Issue Date:||2018||Publisher:||Frontiers Research Foundation||Source:||Frontiers in psychology, Nov. 2018, v. 9, 2110, p. 1-9 How to cite?||Journal:||Frontiers in psychology||Abstract:||This study explores the issues involving pragmatic inferences with prosodic cues. Although there is a well-established literature from multiple languages demonstrating how different pragmatic inferences can be applied to the same syntactic structure, few studies discuss whether prosody can determine types of alternative sets based on the same syntactic structure. In Mandarin Chinese, the same sentence containing a numeral- classifier phrase as a negative polarity item can be employed for two types of scalar inferences based on either the numeral or the noun. The sentence wo yi zhi mayi dou mei kan dao ("I didn't even see one ant") can induce two different scalar inferences: Quantity-contrast ('I did not see one ant, much less two ants, three ants, and so on' by drawing a contrast against the minimal quantity of one), and Type contrast ('I did not see an ant, much less a dog, a cat, a human being, and so on' by drawing a contrast against the minimally surprising type, that of ants). Taking advantage of similar sentences with the syntactic structure and lexical items, our study examines whether prosodic conditions can guide people to choose pragmatic inferences from a set of options based on the same syntactic structure. The experiments of this study are designed to answer whether prosody interacts with contextual information in this grammatical structure. The results suggest that Mandarin speakers can use sentence prosody to determine which inference is intended, at least in experimental contexts that directly probe explicit awareness of prosody. Prosody does play a role in inducing scalar inferences, but contextual information can override the effects of prosody. Each prosodic pattern can evoke a specific set of scalar inferences, but quantity-contrast inferences are favored over type-contrast inferences. Our experiments show that prosodic prominence can serve as a linguistic cue to pragmatic inferences.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80248||EISSN:||1664-1078||DOI:||10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02110||Rights:||Copyright © 2018 Chen, Huang and Politzer-Ahles. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
The following publication Chen, I.H., Huang, C.R., & Politzer-Ahles, S. (2018). Determining the types of contrasts : the influences of prosody on pragmatic inferences. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2110, 1-9 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02110
|Appears in Collections:||Journal/Magazine Article|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Chen_Types_Contrasts_Prosody.pdf||916.77 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Citations as of Feb 19, 2019
Citations as of Feb 19, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.