Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/78502
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorCheong, CMen_US
dc.creatorZhu, XHen_US
dc.creatorLiao, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-28T01:16:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-28T01:16:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn0922-4777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/78502-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017en_US
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Reading and Writing. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9811-8.en_US
dc.subjectIntegrated writingen_US
dc.subjectReading processen_US
dc.subjectListening processen_US
dc.subjectCognitive skillen_US
dc.subjectChinese language as L1en_US
dc.titleDifferences between the relationship of L1 learners' performance in integrated writing with both independent listening and independent reading cognitive skillsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage779en_US
dc.identifier.epage811en_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11145-017-9811-8en_US
dcterms.abstractIn recent decades, integrated language competence has been highlighted in the language curricula taught in schools and institutions, and the relationship between test-takers' performance on integrated tasks and comprehension sources has been much studied. The current study employed the frameworks of reading and listening comprehension processes to examine the difference between the effects of reading competence and listening competence on integrated writing performance. A total of 152 Secondary 5 students from five local schools in Hong Kong responded to three tasks, including an independent listening task, an independent reading task and an integrated writing task. The reading cognitive skills contributed more towards the performance of the integrated writing task than the listening cognitive skills did. Furthermore, the interaction between the relationships of reading and listening to the integrated writing performance was significant. Three subskills each for both listening and reading that belong to higher-order thinking skills-Elaborating, Evaluating and Creating-had significant correlation with integrated writing performance. Implications for the teaching of integrated writing were also discussed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationReading and writing, Apr. 2018, v. 31, no. 4, p. 779-811en_US
dcterms.isPartOfReading and writingen_US
dcterms.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000426807300002-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017003361-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validate201809 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0934-n05-
dc.identifier.SubFormID2165-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2165_Cheong-Differences-between-relationship.pdfPre-Published version505.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

149
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

261
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.