Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/77201
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering-
dc.creatorHe, C-
dc.creatorTo, MKT-
dc.creatorCheung, JPY-
dc.creatorCheung, KMC-
dc.creatorChan, CK-
dc.creatorJiang, WW-
dc.creatorZhou, GQ-
dc.creatorLai, KKL-
dc.creatorZheng, YP-
dc.creatorWong, MS-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-30T08:26:52Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-30T08:26:52Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/77201-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2017 He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication: He C, To MK-T, Cheung JP-Y, Cheung KM-C, Chan C-K, Jiang W-W, et al. (2017) An effective assessment method of spinal flexibility to predict the initial in-orthosis correction on the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PLoS ONE 12(12): e0190141 is available at this publication https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190141en_US
dc.titleAn effective assessment method of spinal flexibility to predict the initial in-orthosis correction on the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0190141en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground Spinal flexibility is an essential parameter for clinical decision making on the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Various methods are proposed to assess spinal flexibility, but which assessment method is more effective to predict the effect of orthotic treatment is unclear.-
dcterms.abstractObjective:To investigate an effective assessment method of spinal flexibility to predict the initial in-orthosis correction, among the supine, prone, sitting with lateral bending and prone with lateral bending positions. Methods Thirty-five patients with AIS (mean Cobb angle: 28° ± 7° mean age: 12 ± 2 years Risser sign: 0–2) were recruited. Before orthosis fitting, spinal flexibility was assessed by an ultrasound system in 4 positions (apart from standing) including supine, prone, sitting with lateral bending and prone with lateral bending. After orthosis fitting, the initial in-orthosis correction was routinely assessed by whole spine standing radiograph. Comparisons and correlation analyses were performed between the spinal flexibility in the 4 positions and the initial in-orthosis correction.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The mean in-orthosis correction was 41% while the mean curve correction (spinal flexibility) in the 4 studied positions were 40% (supine), 42% (prone), 127% (prone with lateral bending) and 143% (sitting with lateral bending). The correlation coefficients between initial in-orthosis correction and curve correction (spinal flexibility) in the 4 studied positions were r = 0.66 (supine), r = 0.75 (prone), r = 0.03 (prone with lateral bending) and r = 0.04 (sitting with lateral bending).-
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The spinal flexibility in the prone position is the closest to and most correlated with the initial in-orthosis correction among the 4 studied positions. Thus, the prone position could be an effective method to predict the initial effect of orthotic treatment on the patients with AIS.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPLoS one, 2017, v. 12, no. 12 e0190141-
dcterms.isPartOfPLoS one-
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85038926880-
dc.identifier.pmid29267389-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.artne0190141en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017001837-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.validate201807 bcrc;1810_a bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
He_effective_assessment_method.pdf7.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

135
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

112
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.