Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/76728
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruyns, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T04:29:54Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-15T04:29:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.citationCubic journal, Apr. 2018, v. 1, no. 1, p. 52-73en_US
dc.identifier.issn2589-7098en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/76728-
dc.description.abstractHow and in what manner has the social been instrumental in formulating planning policies, and, does Hong Kong ascribe to any social concept that facilitates its current spatial planning framework? The legacy of the social in planning originally came to fruition within the Chicago School of Social Sciences during the early 1920’s. Since then, the understanding of the social and how planning responds to the social has been wide and varied. This paper examines the social’s application in spatial notions in addition to its context within Hong Kong. At its core this argument outlines the consequences of a social notion within planning and the spatial modes of recourse. Issues of scaling are brought into question when addressing planning as well as economic focus, in both the local as well as regional governance levels, which further emphasises the dynamic proxies of social and spatial factors for territorial planning. Having neither of these, the argument then highlights the realities of economic asymmetries in the disempowerment of a local populous through land speculation and housing shortages.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Designen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJap Sam Booksen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCubic journalen_US
dc.rightsCubic Journal is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Work may be copied, shared and distributed when authors are properly accredited; this includes outlines of any work. Amendments to the original work needs to be shown. The licensor does not in any way endorse third party views or how journal content is used by others.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Bruyns, G. (2018). The Social and The Spatial, Urban Models as Morphologies for a ‘Lived’ Approach to Planning. Cubic Journal, 1(1), 52-73 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.31182/cubic.2018.1.003en_US
dc.subjectLived morphologyen_US
dc.subjectSocial futuresen_US
dc.subjectUrban modelsen_US
dc.subjectMonocentric vs polycentricen_US
dc.subjectSpatial planningen_US
dc.titleThe social and the spatial, urban models as morphologies for a ‘lived’ approach to planningen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage52en_US
dc.identifier.epage73en_US
dc.identifier.volume1en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31182/cubic.2018.1.003en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2589-7101en_US
dc.description.validate201805 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oapublished_final-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cubic_2018_1_003_Bruyns.pdf3.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Contents

Page view(s)

130
Citations as of Jun 18, 2018

Download(s)

26
Citations as of Jun 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.