Back to results list
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A comparison between electromyography-driven robot and passive motion device on wrist rehabilitation for chronic stroke||Authors:||Hu, X
|Issue Date:||Oct-2009||Publisher:||SAGE Publications||Source:||Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Oct. 2009, v. 23, no. 8, p. 837-846 How to cite?||Journal:||Neurorehabilitation and neural repair||Abstract:||Background: The effect of using robots to improve motor recovery has received increased attention, even though the most effective protocol remains a topic of study.
Objective: The objective was to compare the training effects of treatments on the wrist joint of subjects with chronic stroke with an interactive rehabilitation robot and a robot with continuous passive motion.
Methods: This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up. Twenty-seven hemiplegic subjects with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to receive 20-session wrist training with a continuous electromyography (EMG)-driven robot (interactive group, n = 15) and a passive motion device (passive group, n = 12), completed within 7 consecutive weeks. Training effects were evaluated with clinical scores by pretraining and posttraining tests (Fugl-Meyer Assessment [FMA] and Modified Ashworth Score [MAS]) and with session-by-session EMG parameters (EMG activation level and co-contraction index).
Results: Significant improvements in FMA scores (shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand) were found in the interactive group (P < .05). Significant decreases in the MAS were observed in the wrist and elbow joints for the interactive group and in the wrist joint for the passive group (P < .05). These MAS changes were associated with the decrease in EMG activation level of the flexor carpi radialis and the biceps brachii for the interactive group (P < .05). The muscle coordination on wrist and elbow joints was improved in the interactive groups in the EMG co-contraction indexes across the training sessions (P < .05).
Conclusions: The interactive treatment improved muscle coordination and reduced spasticity after the training for both the wrist and elbow joints, which persisted for 3 months. The passive mode training mainly reduced the spasticity in the wrist flexor.
|URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7151||ISSN:||1545-9683||EISSN:||1552-6844||DOI:||10.1177/1545968309338191||Rights:||© 2009 The Author(s)
The final, definitive version of the article is available on SAGE Journals (http://online.sagepub.com) is located at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968309338191
|Appears in Collections:||Journal/Magazine Article|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Hu_comparison_electromyography_driven.pdf||Pre-published version||305.52 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.