Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/71007
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorKan, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-28T06:18:44Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-28T06:18:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn1461-6718en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/71007-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an original manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Housing Policy on 29 Nov 2016 (Published online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1248607.en_US
dc.subjectReal estateen_US
dc.subjectForeign investmenten_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectUrbanisationen_US
dc.titleThe (geo)politics of land and foreign real estate investment in China : the case of Hong Kong FDIen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage35en_US
dc.identifier.epage55en_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14616718.2016.1248607en_US
dcterms.abstractMarket reforms and the relaxation of rules governing inbound investment have contributed to the growth of foreign investment in Chinese real estate. Although the property sector remains one of the most tightly regulated, property developers from Greater China have enjoyed relative success in the mainland market. Conventional explanations of such investment outcomes have often drawn attention to economic complementaries and cultural proximities. By tracing the development of Hong Kong investment in China's real estate from the late 1970s to the present, this paper demonstrates the importance of considering (geo)politics at both the national and ground levels in analysing bilateral economic relations. The geopolitical prerogatives of national sovereignty structure economic interactions between the Chinese state and the Special Administrative Region, while popular politics from the ground level up interacts with state-level geopolitics to affect and change policy outcomes. The shifting dynamics demonstrate that the cultural meaning and value of foreign capital are not static or fixed but rather open to continuous re-negotiation and contestation.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of housing policy, 2017, v. 17, no. 1, special issue, p. 35-55en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of housing policyen_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000396618800003-
dc.identifier.ros2016000340-
dc.identifier.eissn1473-3269en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2016000339-
dc.description.ros2016-2017 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validatebcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAuthor’s Originalen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAPSS-0487-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextCentennial College (CRG)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6777521-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kan_Geopolitics_Of_Land.pdfPreprint version307.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Author’s Original
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

57
Citations as of May 19, 2024

Downloads

47
Citations as of May 19, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Citations as of May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.