Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6994
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorChan, DWM-
dc.creatorChan, JHL-
dc.creatorMa, T-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:29:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:29:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-2772-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/6994-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.rights© Emerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.rightsThis article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here (http://repository.lib.polyu.edu.hk/). Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_US
dc.rightsThe published version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2012-0063en_US
dc.subjectRisk managementen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy synthetic evaluationen_US
dc.subjectGuaranteed maximum price contractsen_US
dc.subjectSouth Australiaen_US
dc.subjectTarget cost contractsen_US
dc.titleDeveloping a fuzzy risk assessment model for guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in South Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage624-
dc.identifier.epage646-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue11/12-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/F-08-2012-0063-
dcterms.abstractPurpose – This paper aims to develop a fuzzy risk assessment model for construction projects procured with target cost contracts and guaranteed maximum price contracts (TCC/GMP) using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method, based on an empirical questionnaire survey with relevant industrial practitioners in South Australia.-
dcterms.abstractDesign/methodology/approach – A total of 34 major risk factors inherent with TCC/GMP contracts were identified through an extensive literature review and a series of structured interviews. A questionnaire survey was then launched to solicit the opinions of industrial practitioners on risk assessment of such risk factors.-
dcterms.abstractFindings – The most important 14 key risk factors after the computation of normalised values were selected for undertaking fuzzy evaluation analysis. Five key risk groups (KRGs) were then generated in descending order of importance as: physical risks, lack of experience of contracting parties throughout TCC/GMP procurement process, design risks, contractual risks and delayed payment on contracts. These survey findings also revealed that physical risks may be the major hurdle to the success of TCC/GMP projects in South Australia.-
dcterms.abstractPractical implications – Although the fuzzy risk assessment model was developed for those new-build construction projects procured by TCC/GMP contracts in this paper, the same research methodology may be applied to other contracts within the wide spectrum of facilities management or building maintenance services under the target cost-based model. Therefore, the contribution from this paper could be extended to the discipline of facilities management as well.-
dcterms.abstractOriginality/value – An overall risk index associated with TCC/GMP construction projects and the risk indices of individual KRGs can be generated from the model for reference. An objective and a holistic assessment can be achieved. The model has provided a solid platform to measure, evaluate and reduce the risk levels of TCC/GMP projects based on objective evidence instead of subjective judgements. The research methodology could be replicated in other countries or regions to produce similar models for international comparisons, and the assessment of risk levels for different types of TCC/GMP projects (including new-build or maintenance) worldwide.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFacilities, Aug. 2014, v. 32, no. 11/12, p. 624-646-
dcterms.isPartOfFacilities-
dcterms.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84916229119-
dc.identifier.eissn1758-7131-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr62697-
dc.description.ros2012-2013 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PolyU IR Submission 2014_FJ_1.pdfPre-published version250.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

228
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 5, 2024

Downloads

295
Citations as of May 5, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.