Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6973
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketing-
dc.creatorHsieh, JJPA-
dc.creatorRai, A-
dc.creatorKeil, M-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:29:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:29:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn1047-7047-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/6973-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Operations Research and the Management Sciencesen_US
dc.rights© 2011, INFORMS.en_US
dc.rightsReproduced with permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.subjectCapital theoryen_US
dc.subjectHabitusen_US
dc.subjectCultural capitalen_US
dc.subjectSocial capitalen_US
dc.subjectEconomic capitalen_US
dc.subjectDigital divideen_US
dc.subjectDigital inequalityen_US
dc.subjectICT policyen_US
dc.subjectSocioeconomic inequalityen_US
dc.titleAddressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through Government initiatives : forms of capital that affect ICT utilizationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage233-
dc.identifier.epage253-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.1287/isre.1090.0256-
dcterms.abstractDigital inequality, or unequal access to and use of information and communication technologies (ICT), is a severe problem preventing the socioeconomically disadvantaged (SED) from participating in a digital society. To understand the critical resources that contribute to digital inequality and inform public policy for stimulating initial and continued ICT usage by the SED, we drew on capital theories and conducted a field study to investigate: (1) the forms of capital for using ICT and how they differ across potential adopters who are SED and socioeconomically advantaged (SEA); (2) how these forms of capitals are relatively impacted for the SEA and the SED through public policy for ICT access; and (3) how each form of capital influences the SED's intentions to use initially and to continue to use ICT. The context for our study involved a city in the southeastern United States that offered its citizens free ICT access for Internet connectivity. Our results show that SED potential adopters exhibited lower cultural capital but higher social capital relative to the SEA. Moreover, the SED who participated in the city's initiative realized greater positive gains in cultural capital, social capital, and habitus than the SEA. In addition, we find that the SED's initial intention to use ICT was influenced by intrinsic motivation for habitus, self-efficacy for cultural capital, and important referents' expectations and support from acquaintances for social capital. Cultural capital and social cultural capital also complemented each other in driving the SED's initial use intention. The SED's continued use intention was affected by both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for habitus and both knowledge and self-efficacy for cultural capital but was not affected by social capital. We also make several recommendations for future research on digital inequality and ICT acceptance to extend and apply the proposed capital framework.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInformation systems research, June 2011, v. 22, no. 2, p. 233-253-
dcterms.isPartOfInformation systems research-
dcterms.issued2011-06-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000292087900003-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79960724132-
dc.identifier.eissn1526-5536-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr54325-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hsieh_addressing_digital_inequality.pdfMain article477.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

190
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

1,011
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

114
Last Week
0
Last month
2
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

91
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.