Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6713
Title: Impact of Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong
Authors: Yu, ATW 
Poon, CS 
Wong, A
Yip, R
Jaillon, L
Keywords: Construction and demolition waste
Polluter-Pays-Principle
Recycling
Sorting
Waste Disposal Charging Scheme
Issue Date: Jan-2013
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Source: Waste management, Jan. 2013, v. 33, no. 1, p. 138-146 How to cite?
Journal: Waste management 
Abstract: Waste management in the building industry in Hong Kong has become an important environmental issue. Particularly, an increasing amount of construction and demolition (C&D) waste is being disposed at landfill sites. In order to reduce waste generation and encourage reuse and recycling, the Hong Kong Government has implemented the Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme (CWDCS) to levy charges on C&D waste disposal to landfills. In order to provide information on the changes in reducing waste generation practice among construction participants in various work trades, a study was conducted after 3 years of implementation of the CWDCS via a structured questionnaire survey in the building industry in Hong Kong. The study result has revealed changes with work flows of the major trades as well as differentiating the levels of waste reduced. Three building projects in the public and private sectors were selected as case studies to demonstrate the changes in work flows and the reduction of waste achieved. The research findings reveal that a significant reduction of construction waste was achieved at the first 3 years (2006–2008) of CWDCS implementation. However, the reduction cannot be sustained. The major trades have been influenced to a certain extent by the implementation of the CWDCS. Slight improvement in waste management practices was observed, but reduction of construction waste in the wet-finishing and dry-finishing trades has undergone little improvement. Implementation of the CWDCS has not yet motivated subcontractors to change their methods of construction so as to reduce C&D waste.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6713
ISSN: 0956-053X
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.023
Rights: © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Waste Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Waste Management, vol 33, issue 1, (Jan 2013) DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.023
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WM_Paper_2-Tables_AY.pdfTables (Pre-published version)34.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
WM_Paper_2-Figures_AY.pdfFigures (Pre-published version)294.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
WM_Paper_2-Amended_by_AY.pdfMain text (Pre-published version)68.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 12, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
Last Week
0
Last month
1
Citations as of Aug 12, 2017

Page view(s)

406
Last Week
3
Last month
Checked on Aug 13, 2017

Download(s)

780
Checked on Aug 13, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.