Back to results list
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Research trend of joint ventures in construction : a two-decade taxonomic review||Authors:||Hong, Y
|Issue Date:||May-2014||Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited||Source:||Journal of facilities management, May 2014, v. 12, no. 2, p. 118-141 How to cite?||Journal:||Journal of facilities management||Abstract:||Purpose – This paper aims to systematically and critically explore the research trend of construction joint ventures (CJVs) in some selected leading construction journals over the past two decades between 1993 and 2012. It is also expected that some valuable insights into the extended application of JVs to facilities service management and maintenance could be generated from the research findings.
Design/methodology/approach – A powerful search engine “Scopus” was selected to identify those journals that have published CJV-related articles. The papers related to CJVs, as retrieved from the selected journals, were first classified based on their relevance to CJV study and were then analyzed in terms of the annual number of CJV-related publications, research focus of CJV studies and the applied research methods and techniques. Future research directions are suggested to enrich and add value to the extant literature about CJVs.
Findings – An apparent increasing trend of research on CJVs has been witnessed over the past two decades. A critical analysis of the two-decade research outputs indicated that research topics of CJVs published in the selected journals consist of several key areas: theory and model development; motives, benefits and other strategic demands of application; performance measurement or management; risk assessment or management; influential factors for practice; problematic issues and challenges in practice; and managerial practices of CJVs in the industry. This study also identified that the research methods employed in CJV studies are predominantly questionnaire survey, case study, literature review/analysis, and interview. Research techniques applied in CJV studies were classified into seven main groups, with rank-order analysis, structural equation modelling and regression analysis being the three mostly adopted analytical tools.
Research limitations/implications – The critical review of CJV literature reveals several inherent limitations of the existing research and practices of CJVs, The research findings also help visualize future research directions associated with the identification of barriers to the adoption and successful operation of CJVs, investigation of the appropriateness and effectiveness of CJV contracting strategies, and exploration into possible strategies for improving the industrial applications in future.
Originality/value – Joint ventures have been extensively used in the construction sector, which calls for the need of more rigorous and meaningful research to guide the appropriate and effective use of it. The findings of this taxonomic review could provide useful insights towards researchers into shaping their research foci under the umbrella of CJVs to suit the demands of both the literature base and the real construction market.
|URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6636||ISSN:||1472-5967||EISSN:||1741-0983||DOI:||10.1108/JFM-04-2013-0022||Rights:||© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=17108291&WT.mc_id=journaltocalerts. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
|Appears in Collections:||Journal/Magazine Article|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Hong_Joint_Ventures_Construction.pdf||Pre-published version||347.55 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Citations as of Nov 27, 2018
Citations as of Dec 9, 2018
Citations as of Dec 9, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.