Back to results list
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Psychometric properties of Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) in evaluating balance performance in individuals with chronic stroke||Authors:||Huang, M
|Issue Date:||2017||Publisher:||John Wiley & Sons Ltd.||Source:||Brain and behavior, 2017, v. 7, no. 3, e00649 How to cite?||Journal:||Brain and behavior||Abstract:||Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest) in individuals with chronic stroke.
Materials and Methods: This was an observational study with repeated measurements involving 50 participants with chronic stroke [mean (SD) age: 59.2 (7.3) years]. Each participant with stroke was evaluated with the Brief-BESTest, Berg balance scale (BBS), Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA), Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Two raters (rater 1 and 2) provided the Brief-BESTest scores of the first 27 participants independently to establish inter-rater reliability. After 15 min of rest, the same 27 participants were evaluated with the Brief-BESTest again by rater 1 to establish intra-rater reliability. The Brief-BESTest scores of the stroke group were also compared with those of the control group [n = 27, mean (SD) age: 56.7 (7.7) years].
Results: The Brief-BESTest had no substantial floor and ceiling effects, good intra-rater (ICC2,1 = 0.974) and inter-rater (ICC2,1 = 0.980) reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.818). The minimal detectable change at 95% confidence level was 2 points. The Brief-BESTest showed moderate to very strong correlations with other balance (BBS and PASS) and motor impairment (FMA, CMSA) measures (rs =.547–.911, p <.001), thus revealing good concurrent and convergent validity. Its correlation with measures that evaluated other constructs was weaker (MoCA: rs =.437, p =.002) or non-significant (GDS: rs = −0.152, p =.292), thus showing good discriminant validity. Good known-groups validity was established, as the Brief-BESTest was effective in distinguishing participants with stroke from controls (cutoff score: <18, area under curve: 0.942), and individuals with stroke who required assistive device for their outdoor mobility from those who did not (cutoff score <14, area under curve: 0.810).
Conclusions: The Brief-BESTest has good reliability and validity in assessing balance function in individuals with chronic stroke.
|URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10397/64835||ISSN:||2162-3279 (online)||DOI:||10.1002/brb3.649||Rights:||This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
This article Huang, M., & Pang, M. Y. (2017). Psychometric properties of Brief‐Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief‐BESTest) in evaluating balance performance in individuals with chronic stroke. Brain and Behavior, 7(3) is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.649
|Appears in Collections:||Journal/Magazine Article|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Huang_et_al-2017-Brain_and_Behavior.pdf||444.44 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Citations as of Aug 14, 2018
Citations as of Aug 14, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.