Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/64789
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Identification of biomechanical risk factors for the development of lower-back disorders during manual rebar tying
Authors: Umer, W
Li, H 
Szeto, GPY 
Wong, A 
Issue Date: Jan-2017
Source: Journal of construction engineering and management, Jan. 2017, v. 143, no. 1, 04016080, p. 1-10
Abstract: High prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers pose challenges to the productivity and occupational health of the construction industry. To mitigate the risk of musculoskeletal disorders, construction managers need to deepen their understanding of the physical and biomechanical demands of various construction tasks so that appropriate policies and preventive measures can be implemented. Among various construction trades, rebar workers are highly susceptible to lower-back disorders (LBDs) given the physically demanding nature of their work tasks. In particular, rebar tying is considered to be closely related to LBDs because it exposes workers to multiple ergonomic risk factors (repetitive works in prolonged static and awkward postures). The objective of the current study was to compare the differences in lumbar biomechanics during three typical rebar tying postures: stooping, one-legged kneeling, and squatting. Biomechanical variables including trunk muscle activity and trunk kinematics were measured by surface electromyography and motion sensors, respectively. Ten healthy male participants performed a simulated rebar tying task in each of the three postures in a laboratory setting. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that while each posture has its unique trunk kinematic characteristics, all these postures involved excessive trunk inclination that exceeded the internationally recommended trunk inclination angle of 60° for static working postures. Of the three postures, stooping posture demonstrated a significant reduction in electromyographic activity of lumbar muscles (a reduction in 60–80% of muscle activity as compared to the other two postures). The reduced muscle activity may shift the loading to passive spinal structures (e.g., spinal ligaments and joint capsules), which is known to be a risk factor for LBD development. Collectively, the results from this study may help explain the high prevalence of LBDs in rebar workers. Future studies are warranted to confirm the findings at construction sites and to develop appropriate ergonomic approaches for rebar workers.
Keywords: Construction ergonomics
Rebar tying
Occupational health and safety
Biomechanical evaluation
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Journal: Journal of construction engineering and management 
ISSN: 0733-9364
EISSN: 1943-7862
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001208
Rights: © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers
This material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001208
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0829-n22_1917.pdfPre-Published version1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

157
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

Downloads

121
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

68
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Mar 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

51
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.