Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/618
Title: Peer assessment of language proficiency
Authors: Cheng, W 
Warren, M 
Keywords: English language proficiency
Peer assessment
Issue Date: Jan-2005
Publisher: Edward Arnold
Source: Language testing, Jan. 2005, v. 22, no. 1, p. 93-121 How to cite?
Journal: Language testing 
Abstract: This article describes part of an investigation into the reliability and potential benefits of incorporating peer assessment into English language programmes. Undergraduate Engineering students attending a university in Hong Kong were asked to assess the English language proficiency of their peers - among other assessment criteria, such as preparation, content, organisation, and delivery - as exhibited in the seminar, oral presentation and written report of an integrated group project. The paper compares the students' attitudes towards assessing both the English language proficiency and other aspects of performance of their peers. It also compares peer and teacher assessments. The findings suggest that students had a less positive attitude towards assessing their peers' language proficiency, but they did not score their peers' language proficiency very differently from the other assessment criteria. Students and teachers were different in their respective marking behaviours and the ways oral and written language proficiency were interpreted. While students derived benefits from the peer assessment exercise, a question mark hangs over incorporating peer assessment for both language proficiency and the other criteria into the regular assessment process until such differences are resolved. Suggestions are made for improvement in procedures and future research.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/618
ISSN: 0265-5322
DOI: 10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
Rights: © 2005 Edward Arnold (Publishers), Sage Publications.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LT_298.pdfPre-published version351.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

35
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 14, 2017

Page view(s)

467
Last Week
0
Last month
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Download(s)

5,737
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.